1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Muh Muh Muh My Corona (virus)

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Twirling Time, Jan 21, 2020.

  1. Spartan Squad

    Spartan Squad Well-Known Member

    Fact checking and confirming is one thing and where he should have stopped. But the other side is the photographer is blowing Covid out of proportion and what Alma has been pushing. We have too many nurses stories. Teachers are babies who should suck it up and go back to work and now people getting pissed that people are concerned they were just exposed and have to worry about their kids demands we get the fair and balanced side from crack pots.
     
    2muchcoffeeman and wicked like this.
  2. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    I'd be surprised if the editors corroborated that story. It would have required the photographer giving the names of the party.
     
  3. gingerbread

    gingerbread Well-Known Member

    But that's often a conversation between reporter and editor (or should be). I've been on both sides -- as a reporter, I've given my editor the names and contacts for verification; and as an editor I've asked for both.
     
  4. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    Yes, it does. I'm just cynical that there was ever an intent, from the top down, to get both sides of that anecdote.
     
    gingerbread likes this.
  5. Jerry-atric

    Jerry-atric Well-Known Member

    Everyone is forgetting about the possibility that the bridesmaid might have even said: “Of course I said it. It was her wedding day after all! Gotta break a few eggs to make an omelet.”
     
  6. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

  7. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Here's the relevant line in the Texas Monthly story:

    “I think most people’s intentions are good,” said one photographer, who, like most who shared their stories, asked to be anonymous because she didn’t want to risk losing more work than she already has this year.

    Enough?
     
  8. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Sure.

    So there's a grant of anonymity for everyone.

    Presumably the reporter and the editors know the photographers' names - and the dates of the weddings and have seen photographs from those weddings.

    And they trust the photographers sufficiently to quote a couple of them in a couple of instances.

    Again, the reporter and the editors were comfortable enough with their sourcing that they ran the story.

    I think the risk of following up with attendees at these weddings to get their "side" of things puts the photographers' livelihoods in jeopardy.
     
    Last edited: Dec 20, 2020
    wicked and 2muchcoffeeman like this.
  9. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member


    Yep. Get all that. Wouldn’t have run it. Makes me uncool. I get that, too.

    As to your last graph...no photographer’s livelihood was at stake. The anecdote was. The perfect kicker was. The minute the writer says “you know, that accusation is so specific and shocking I’d have to corroborate that before I used it” is the same minute the photographer says “no, I could lose all my business!” And then the anecdote doesn’t run.

    But this kind of stuff happens often. If it seems poetically true - and it’s a truth the media believes is important - the story gets told.
     
    Last edited: Dec 20, 2020
  10. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    Video shows mishap during COVID-19 vaccination of El Paso nurses

    "After numerous reports emerged on social media claiming one of the five nurses receiving a vaccination on Tuesday did not receive a full dose of vaccine, we want to remove any doubt raised that he was not fully vaccinated and further strengthen confidence in the vaccination process."

    "The nurse in question today was vaccinated again. UMC has confirmed with the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) that re-vaccinating the nurse will not cause adverse effects. The nurse will need to return after three weeks to receive his second dose."


    This is apparently the "re-vaccinated" photo ...

    [​IMG]


     
  11. Jerry-atric

    Jerry-atric Well-Known Member

    The New Yorker has admitted this, my friend.

    “We remain confident about the value of ‘A Theory of Relativity’ as an exploration of ideas of family in Japan and more widely.”
     
  12. Scout

    Scout Well-Known Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page