1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Muh Muh Muh My Corona (virus)

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Twirling Time, Jan 21, 2020.

  1. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    What does that mean?

    Bench scientists have the capability to manipulate viruses for experiments and various research goals -- The subtitle for the New York article says, "For decades, scientists have been hot-wiring viruses in hopes of preventing a pandemic, not causing one. But what if …?

    Again, he has no evidence that happened.

    At the same time, you keep dismissing the possibility of it as disproven -- and that isn't true . You linked to that Nature Medicine article and told me that I am part of the problem because I don't read. That article addressed the "They created a man-made virus in a lab to start a pandemic" conspiracy theories. That New York magazine article didn't suggest that.
     
  2. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    I'm not saying anything.

    I'm saying READ the article and if you think it is unsound -- or scientifically unsound, which was what someone said that I quoted and responded to -- address what he actually wrote in the article.

    It was a perfectly valid piece for them to run. There is a top virology lab in the backyard of where the virus first appeared, and there have been a lot of conspiracy theories from the earliest days of the pandemic. It's natural that someone would go there. And he actually did exhaustive legwork for that piece and interviews. What he theorized actually could have been POSSIBLE. Doesn't mean it happened. There is no evidence of it. But the level of dismissiveness on this thread, like "how dare he write that? The smartest people in the world have disproven that! (no they haven't)" came across like shouting down what he is suggesting rather than addressing it on its substance.
     
    Last edited: Jan 5, 2021
  3. hondo

    hondo Well-Known Member

    Message for all the Qanon Karens from a real doctor:

     
    lakefront, OscarMadison and Driftwood like this.
  4. Spartan Squad

    Spartan Squad Well-Known Member

    Fine.

    I read the article and basically
    • He doesn't directly talk to anyone directly involved
      • All his quotes are either from people in the field who may or may not be researching, but he doesn't make it clear so I think the answer is they are not
      • The people he does quote with knowledge he doesn't actually talk to—he quotes other sources
    • It's basically a history lesson of lab mishaps that he uses to "ask questions"
    • He's pulling a hamstring trying to say on both sides of the fence
      • It isn't likely the cause, but we should look
      • It isn't likely the cause, but politics have stopped us from asking questions
      • It isn't likely the cause, but that lab is close to the outbreak site
      • If it was engineered, it would have been engineered differently, but it could have been a lab accident
        • And he doesn't talk to people with direct knowledge
    • He says people are so eager to not buy into Trump's racism, they don't want to investigate it was lab created
    As a history lesson, it is interesting. But that's about it. It reads like a defense of the Shroud of Turin being real while talking about the history of pseudoscience to make his defense seem legit.
     
  5. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    “hot-wiring” viruses leaves signs in the virus’s makeup. Those signs are not there. End of story.
     
    2muchcoffeeman likes this.
  6. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    It’s an advertisement for the guy’s book
     
  7. I Should Coco

    I Should Coco Well-Known Member

    It's not a perfect comparison, but I'm reminded of the amazing waste of time and resources trying to track down which person and/or chimpanzee was Patient Zero as the AIDS virus was raging.
     
  8. Spartan Squad

    Spartan Squad Well-Known Member

    Wasn't there a guy everyone thought was Patient Zero (for the US anyway) and it turned out he wasn't?
     
    I Should Coco likes this.
  9. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Your "end of story" notwithstanding. ... um, no.

    You can (and they do) create viral hybrids (for example of bat and human viruses) in lab cultures, for which nobody else could possibly know if they developed in nature or in a lab culture.
     
  10. qtlaw

    qtlaw Well-Known Member

    What good does it do to wonder "what might be" when we need to first deal with the facts that we have at hand? All it does is lead to confusion.

    If you want to scrutinize, go ahead, but use known facts.
     
    OscarMadison and Spartan Squad like this.
  11. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    The source of the virus is really important. That lab may be collecting pathogens in the wild and creating hybrids, and if one of them escaped and created the pandemic, it's something we all would have a stake in, just in terms of trying to prevent future pandemics.

    There are enough facts at hand for it to be something that people shouldn't just dismiss. An outbreak of a deadly bat virus -- whose origin we do not know -- coincidentally occurred near the only level 4 virology institute in China. ... which happened to be studying the closest known relative of that exact virus.

    Those are the facts. It's certainly worth SOME level of scrutiny.
     
  12. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    literally every expert to study it: no, you can’t

    a guy trying to sell book about government cover-ups: yes, you can


    Who should I believe...
     
    SFIND likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page