1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Muh Muh Muh My Corona (virus)

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Twirling Time, Jan 21, 2020.

  1. UPChip

    UPChip Well-Known Member

    Don't threaten me with a good time.

    That said, I do wonder what the difference in terms of when it is statistically safe to reopen and when political leaders are willing to admit that.
     
  2. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    If we *do* see signs of a slowdown in the drop, I'll be the first one to say so. I'm definitely looking for it.
     
    OscarMadison likes this.
  3. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    Most political leaders are antsy to get things back open. Keeping things shut down is a political loser and they know it. I check the locality numbers every day, and yesterday, the city of Richmond (population 232,866) recorded 41 cases, and it's been trending that way daily of late. I'm not ready to whip my mask off in public yet, but I have very little anxiety anymore about going to the store, the gym, to the usual happy hour hang, etc. If you're telling me there's a 0.017 chance I'm picking up this virus by leaving the house, I'm taking my chances. I have a better chance of getting hit by a car on my daily walk, truth be told.
     
    SFIND likes this.
  4. swingline

    swingline Well-Known Member

    Don’t walk in traffic.

    you’re welcome
     
  5. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    You haven't seen the way people take blind right turns around here when you've got the crosswalk. It's gnarly, man.
     
  6. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    There is no "statistically safe" level unless the virus has been eradicated.

    What you are talking about is a judgment: how much risk in terms of possible infections and deaths is acceptable in return for reduced or no restrictions. You can't really quantify that, because there isn't necessarily a right answer.
     
  7. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    This virus will not be eradicated. So there will always been some slight level of risk, vaccination or no.
     
  8. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    Everybody is just itching to declare all clear and rip the masks off, but jumping the gun by months or weeks will end up costing lives.

    Remember in late summer, August or so, when numbers were trending down week by week, then there was the stampede to open schools and "get back to normal."

    I think more likely we'll just edge down week by week until probably early fall, when we'll look around and say, "guess what, it's over."
     
  9. Hermes

    Hermes Well-Known Member

    Us dumb people have been heard enough for long enough. I’m ready for the smart people to be heard. Keep preaching.
     
    OscarMadison likes this.
  10. Spartan Squad

    Spartan Squad Well-Known Member

    In California it was just the opposite. Things looked good in May/early June and we thought we were going back and throwing doors open. Then by July, the numbers tanked and all of a sudden all talk of opening schools went out the window.
     
  11. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    Rip the mask off? No. Slowly reopen as numbers continue to improve while still taking precautions? Yes. It doesn't have to be one or the other. So much absolutism with this stuff.
     
    SFIND likes this.
  12. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    It almost seems anticlimactic, this thing could well go out with a whimper after ruining (in a first-world sense) our lives for a year.

    Rick, thanks for returning with your updates.
     
    OscarMadison likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page