1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Mike Reed Sets Goals for New Gannett

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Readallover, Jan 19, 2021.

  1. bumpy mcgee

    bumpy mcgee Well-Known Member

    This and schools who can not be broken of their fax machine habits
     
    ChadFelter likes this.
  2. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    I’d prefer to destroy the work hopper than my own.
     
  3. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    Always loved seeing a big newspaper building right down the street or across the street from a city hall, courthouse or state capitol building. One was "we're right here in the middle of it all and we've got our eyes open" - makes it convenient for Editorial types to interview leaders and everyone knew where you were located. Even if you still don't need a big plant, having a big sign on a tall building where you have offices asserts some authority that a suburban office park really doesn't.
     
  4. Matt Stephens

    Matt Stephens Well-Known Member

    I miss the old Denver Post building. It was exactly that.
     
  5. Mngwa

    Mngwa Well-Known Member

    The Fourth Estate
     
  6. LanceyHoward

    LanceyHoward Well-Known Member

    What is happening to the old LA Times building? And the Tribune building in Chicago?
     
  7. Mr. X

    Mr. X Active Member

  8. ChadFelter

    ChadFelter Active Member

    Was talking today to a friend who works at the Wilmington News-Journal … he told me Gannett has a new strategy of adding a bunch of pages to the Sunday editions but not charging anything for it. Calls it “plus” or something to make the elderly readers feel like they’re getting more bang for their buck. Of course, the staff can’t produce any extra content so the plus stuff comes from other states.

    Higher cost, no additional revenue, sounds like another winning business strategy at Gannett.
     
  9. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    The main expense is setting up the press. Adding a few pages won't make much of a difference. Longer run times may back things up since every press is now printing 10 papers, it seems.
     
  10. LanceyHoward

    LanceyHoward Well-Known Member

    Gannett has been telling analysts that it ill go from a million plus electronic subscribers to 10 million. For that to work and the "plus" to work Gannett is going to have to invest in better content.

    To pull this off first Gannett has to make USA Today a product comparable in quality to the Washington Post. It does not have to be exactly like the Washington Post of the New York Times but it needs to have roughly as many reporters and produce material that is as well written. Then Gannett could improve it's electronic product and have more material for print.

    But that costs money and Gannett keeps bragging about their synergies. As long as the goal of management is to cut costs next quarter to pay down the debt the company will continue in it's spiral to Chapter 11.
     
    Woody Long likes this.
  11. Mngwa

    Mngwa Well-Known Member

    Gannett doesn't have the staff left, at any given paper, to produce enough interesting copy to attract that many subscribers.
     
    matt_garth likes this.
  12. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    The 10 million subscribers is a fantasy, unless they are paying people to subscribe.

    But the way some of you are looking at this company is mind boggling.

    It is a company with an ugly balance sheet (and would be gone already if interest rates were a function of actual price discovery) in an industry that is already dead and buried. The amount of debt they took on to even get this far is staggering, and if they hadn't gotten a reprieve by being able to refinance that Apollo loan as part of the merger, they'd be sunk right now.

    Gannett is not "bragging" about synergies.

    They are selling a merger and cost cutting (which they have actually acheived to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars) to shareholders, who have little reason to own the stock, other than it's cheap and everything they do is a hail mary that has a slim chance at a lottery payoff.

    This idea that Gannett is going to "invest" (with what?!?) in creating a product comparable to the Washington Post is absurd.

    This is vulture investing. Interest rates are still negative in real terms, and there are few lending standards, so the unfittest keep surviving. The owners of Gannett are trying to ride that as long as possible. For a while, it did it by throwing off a healthy dividend -- basically selling off the company, loading up on debt, and giving the money to back to its owners. Then the debt took it to the brink of bankruptcy, so no more dividend, and the stock got even cheaper. Now it is selling whatever bullshit it can to keep things going for as long as possible. Try to be the Washington Post? They are flailing away right now, trying things like sports betting and selling non-fungible tokens.
     
    Last edited: May 18, 2021
    sgreenwell likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page