1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Transgender and LGBTQ+ in 2021

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Scout, Jun 10, 2021.

  1. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    A transgender athlete was just banned from the U.S. Olympic trials because her testosterone levels were too high. That news doesn't belong on this thread?
     
  2. lakefront

    lakefront Well-Known Member

    its here. and this alone is the one thing i can see as being reasonable. i dont know about those levels and if you can reduce them or how any of it works but at this level i can see how it might be a dis qualifier. unless there are ways to correct the levels, which i dont know about
     
  3. Mngwa

    Mngwa Well-Known Member

    You know it's hard to argue with a body that has rule that are in place. We are discussing the aesthetics of transgender and athletics on another thread. To me this thread is about far more than athletics, it's about the ability of the LGBTQi community to exist on a daily basis. So yeah take the Olympic stuff to the sports thread where we are talking about transgender athletes.
     
    Twirling Time and Tighthead like this.
  4. Twirling Time

    Twirling Time Well-Known Member

    There are numerous better arenas to argue transgender matters than athletics. That's a 'Duh" proposition, but one that several transphobic governing bodies have foisted upon us. Thank you, Mack Beggs.
     
    Tighthead and Mngwa like this.
  5. WriteThinking

    WriteThinking Well-Known Member

    That idea might work for acting/the arts, but it wouldn't for sports, which are less subjective and subject to definite divisions of achievement levels and definitely different possibilities of potential -- which all are based almost entirely on gender differences.
     
  6. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    I'm really not interested in people telling me to take topics that are relevant to a thread off that thread, thank you very much.

    You are more than welcome to ignore my post and move right along with the thread.
     
  7. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    But gender isn’t real and isn’t fixed.
     
  8. Amy

    Amy Well-Known Member

    SCOTUS denied cert in Gloucester County School Board v. Grimm, in which the 4th Circuit held the school board’s policy requiring him to use a bathroom separate from those used by non-transgender students discriminated against Grimm in violation of Title IX.

    Denial of cert is not a ruling on the merits and, since this ruling is only controlling in the 4th circuit, I would expect the issue will come up in other jurisdictions. If another circuit rules differently, review on the merits would be much more likely.

    Thomas and Alito would have granted review.
     
    Spartan Squad likes this.
  9. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  10. Regan MacNeil

    Regan MacNeil Well-Known Member

    Thomas and Alito would grant review on Plessy v. Ferguson, Dred Scott and Brown v. Board of Education.
     
  11. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

  12. lakefront

    lakefront Well-Known Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page