1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

A&M players to get $10K for fan site interview

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by sporty, Jul 17, 2021.

  1. sporty

    sporty Member

  2. BYH 2: Electric Boogaloo

    BYH 2: Electric Boogaloo Well-Known Member

    This thread being the most recent thread on the J board, right ahead of The Way It Was, is some kind of timing.
     
  3. LanceyHoward

    LanceyHoward Well-Known Member

    I think A@M is leading college athletics into the future. Let's say that you are the rights holder for a major college team. You have an interest in getting the best players to go to your media property. So you start paying for players to endorse watching the programming in television. How much is a five star recruit worth to, for example, the Kansas Basketball Network?
     
  4. Mr. X

    Mr. X Active Member

    I'd love to know what the Texas A&M sports information director thinks about this.
     
  5. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    I’d love to know where this site is getting the money. I remember that quite a few were mom-and-pop shops. Must be part of Rivals or whatever it’s called anymore.
     
  6. PaperClip529

    PaperClip529 Well-Known Member

    I think that headline is a little misleading. I understood this story as a booster with a business paying that 10K. The fan site is just serving as the middle man and putting together the wink-wink interviews. I’d imagine that the fan site either is also getting paid or has an existing relationship with this booster but I don’t know that for sure.

    I am not too worried about this becoming a problem for journalists who cover college football.
     
  7. Matt Stephens

    Matt Stephens Well-Known Member

    FWIW, there are media outlets that are starting to pay athletes for "exclusive" content. I've one of the large recruiting site affiliates announce they're doing it, along with a popular sub-only Colorado sports blog (along with "exclusive merch") and I swear I saw a major metro announce an exclusive deal with select players of a major college team but when I went back last night looking for a copy of the announcement/tweets regarding it, I couldn't find any and I feel like I'm losing my mind. If I find it, I'll share. Just don't want to name the place and then realize I had made it all up in a dream.
     
  8. sgreenwell

    sgreenwell Well-Known Member

    I'm a mod on a message board for my alma mater's basketball team. Every couple of years, we'll do a fundraising drive to pay for hosting and what not, and raise a couple hundred. But from that, we have emails from plenty of our users, and *know* that plenty of them have million dollar homes and own businesses and what not. So yeah, I imagine it could easily serve as a middleman of some sorts, as opposed to this being "honest" revenue generated from advertising.
     
  9. Della9250

    Della9250 Well-Known Member

    Basic: $4.75/month or $50.00/year

    Premium: $12.99/month or $140.00/year

    Varsity: $25.00/month or $275.00/year

    A quick search got me this: As of 2013, there were over 9,500 paying subscribers
     
  10. Twirling Time

    Twirling Time Well-Known Member

    A quick search no doubt attached to any young collegian in the early Aughts, because back then TexAgs was she shit.
     
  11. MeanGreenATO

    MeanGreenATO Well-Known Member

    I'm pretty familiar with TexAgs and how they operate. For years they don't tout themselves as a media outlet, but they get the best access in a North Korea-like atmosphere. They also are among the profitable content sites in all of college football.

    From a media standpoint, this isn't a big deal aside from TexAgs cementing its status as a non-journalism outlet.
     
  12. sporty

    sporty Member

     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page