1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

NYT suspends Crouse for failing to disclose Michael Phelps book deal

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by 2muchcoffeeman, Jul 16, 2021.

  1. Pilot

    Pilot Well-Known Member

    Whoa whoa whoa. No need to attack… 96% of the conversation here.
     
  2. Sports Barf

    Sports Barf Well-Known Member

    Word on the street today is Karen barged into the NYT offices today and demanded to speak to the manager
     
  3. WriteThinking

    WriteThinking Well-Known Member

    OK, that was good.:)
     
    Sports Barf likes this.
  4. Liut

    Liut Well-Known Member

    Good question.
    I was wondering the same thing scrolling through posts until coming upon yours.
     
  5. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Woodward isn't even remotely close to being the same thing. Woodward remains on the masthead of the WaPo in a ceremonial way. They benefit from having his name associated with them as much as he benefits from keeping the association to whatever extent it helps sell his books. But the WaPo is not his main gig, and he's not on the mast because he really does much work for them. He writes books for a living. Of course any of his reporting about Trump was for a book, not for the WaPo.
     
  6. ChrisLong

    ChrisLong Well-Known Member

    Disagree. If he is associated with the publication in any way, shape or form, it is his obligation as a newsman to report it or pass it along to someone who will. News is news.
     
    Liut likes this.
  7. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    I am certain that the WaPo doesn't see him having the obligation to them that you think he does. And neither does he, obviously.

    When that Trump thing was actually a thing, the argument was more along the lines of, "he could have saved lives if he had told people that Trump was downplaying the virus earlier."

    I don't know if that is true, but you are taking that whole thing a step beyond that to suggest that the WaPo has a claim on everything he ever does as long as the two have agreed to keep him connected to the paper because it's mutually beneficial.
     
  8. ChrisLong

    ChrisLong Well-Known Member

    I see your point, but if a newsperson sits on news, they are no longer a newsperson and should disassociate from the publication.
    People not as smart as you who read the WaPo see his name and think we works there.
     
    Liut likes this.
  9. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    The Post is fine with the arrangement. Woodward is fine with the arrangement. He’s not a journalist in the true sense of the word anymore and he hasn’t been for decades.

    Also, about the argument he could’ve saved lives: no. Stupids were going to do what they were going to do.
     
    sgreenwell likes this.
  10. SixToe

    SixToe Well-Known Member

    Crouse just announced on Tweeter that she has resigned.
     
  11. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    Writing for the Washington Post…Karen Crouse!

    or something like that. She’ll land somewhere good
     
  12. matt_garth

    matt_garth Well-Known Member

    I think Crouse had no choice but to resign.

    Still, this thread speaks well of her:

     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2021
    dixiehack likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page