1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Economy

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by TigerVols, May 14, 2020.

  1. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Demand is elastic for Big Macs. There will be people who bought Big Macs prior to the price floor on wages, who no longer will. I will get criticized if I even try to explain elasticity of demand, though, as posting too long.

    Labor is an input cost. McDonald's will face decreased demand because of the price floor on wages. The question is how they deal with it to try to maximize their profits within the constraints they are forced to work within. The likely fallout, as I said, is going to be that the real minimum wage will be $0. As in some segment of McDonald's workers who were earnng $8 an hour or $10 or an hour. ... who now have no job.
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2021
  2. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    He's not trying to outperform the S&P 500. He's runs as pure a hedge fund as exists. He's trying to earn risk-adjusted returns. Emphasis on the risk part. The S&P 500 is dominated by a handful of mega big cap tech stocks with valuations that are beyond anything we have seen in history. If you are pumping money into an S&P 500 index fund, whether you realize it or not, you are essentially buying Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Facebook, Tesla and NVidia. Let's say (I know it's not possible, but follow me on this) those companies have been pumped up to unsustainable valuations on the back of say, a central bank pumping trillions of dollars of liquidity into the system, and that those stocks are likely going to revert to the mean at some point and hit the index very disproportionately. ... actually overshoot on the way down as people panic (i.e. -- lose a lot of their value. ... still great companies, but with stock prices that reflect an unmanipulated reality)? What David Einhorn is doing is forgoing the incredible alpha the S&P 500 has delivered in recent years with an eye toward value. He's the guy who was ringing a cash register when Lehman Brothers collapsed and the stock market tanked.
     
    SFIND likes this.
  3. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    With enough bullshit and a study that just ignores other variables impacting the variable you are studying, you could devise a study that shows that Newton's laws of physics are bunk. The difference is that people like Robert Reich don't spend their time on that. People wouldn't buy it. When it comes to bullshit promising people something for nothing, though, they will buy into any magic bean thinking.
     
  4. Regan MacNeil

    Regan MacNeil Well-Known Member

    Jesus Christ. Fuck 'em, then. They're lucky to get $7.25 then. Also, why is there a shortage of workers? Buncha unemployment freeloaders.
     
  5. Regan MacNeil

    Regan MacNeil Well-Known Member

    Seriously, you display zero ability to show empathy for anyone you don't know. If I'm wrong, I apologize. Maybe I can't comprehend the empathy shown in your posts.
     
  6. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

  7. swingline

    swingline Well-Known Member

    $50 to $60 per day for substitutes? Christ, I made $75 a day nearly 30 years ago when I subbed for two days in Missouri. No wonder nobody wants to do that in Alabama for those wages.
     
    OscarMadison and sgreenwell like this.
  8. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    Last I checked subs around here got $100 a day. Even if you sub every day that's only $18,000 a year. Of course you'll have a second job, but still. At one former joint the SE was a full-time sub. I don't know how he did it.
     
  9. goalmouth

    goalmouth Well-Known Member

    Gov. NoNo: Our economy's great (its 30th)
    Three minutes later: There's a worker shortage.

    LOL
     
  10. sgreenwell

    sgreenwell Well-Known Member

    I did substitute teaching while I was a part-time reporter. It was actually a pretty sweet combination at times - Load up on a couple feature stories, interview the people after school hours, and then type it up the next day while I was "working." Substitute teaching, you're very, very seldom left with an actual lesson to teach the kids, unless the teacher knows you and trusts you. So usually, it's passing out some papers or putting a movie on and then reading a book or doing some writing.

    BUT! You do have to be able to manage a class of teenagers, which obviously not everyone is cut out for. Actually, teenagers and HSers were normally fine - they usually just wanted to be left alone. Middle school was the absolute fucking worst, though. Just a bunch of kids acting out constantly - boys acting like assholes to impress girls, and girls in psychological warfare with one another.
     
  11. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    There's a reason that full time teachers here move to other nearby states. Something about making a lot more money for the same job.
     
    OscarMadison likes this.
  12. Hermes

    Hermes Well-Known Member

    You have just described the first newsroom I worked in.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page