1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Chicago media and WNBA

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Sports Barf, Oct 3, 2021.

  1. Screwball

    Screwball Active Member

    It'd be one thing to say, "They didn't cover the playoff game."

    But: "They didn't cover a conference call."
     
  2. BYH 2: Electric Boogaloo

    BYH 2: Electric Boogaloo Well-Known Member

    I've noticed an interesting and understandable advocacy of women's sports by the media covering them the last few years. I get it--to get the increased coverage you desire for the sports, you need to advocate why--but it does stray a bit into an ethical gray area. But in terms of ethical gray areas strayed into over the last however many years, it registers very low on my list of concerns. And there have been some pretty good exposes written about the NWHL and NWSL by these advocates.
     
    sgreenwell likes this.
  3. JimmyHoward33

    JimmyHoward33 Well-Known Member

    It makes no sense. If there’s this huge audience for the content, wouldn’t you be thrilled to have it all to yourself?

    Why do you need the presence of other media outlets to legitimize your coverage if the audience is there? These people have the chicken and egg backwards; they’re arguing if legacy media covered this niche stuff then the legacy audience would transfer over to their niche coverage. Its bollocks
     
    wicked, SFIND and BurnsWhenIPee like this.
  4. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

  5. playthrough

    playthrough Moderator Staff Member

  6. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    It’s honestly not even one thing to say they didn’t cover a playoff game.

    news outlets should generally cover what they think should be covered (to make money or to send a positive message about who they are as a corporation) and what they can cover. Some print operations have shit for space in their paper and they damn well know, to the click, what people read online.

    The WNBA is very well covered, all things considered, thanks to ESPN.
     
    BurnsWhenIPee likes this.
  7. BYH 2: Electric Boogaloo

    BYH 2: Electric Boogaloo Well-Known Member

  8. Twirling Time

    Twirling Time Well-Known Member

    Weird look or humble brag?
     
  9. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    Just gonna leave this here.

     
  10. goalmouth

    goalmouth Well-Known Member

    The WNBA would cease to exist if it wasn't subsidized by NBA/ ESPN.
     
  11. Regan MacNeil

    Regan MacNeil Well-Known Member

    Some guy always has to be the one to point that out. Thank you for your service.
     
    OscarMadison and PaperClip529 like this.
  12. britwrit

    britwrit Well-Known Member

    It's horrible being on a beat that relatively few people care about.

    You can make those stories about the water board sing but ultimately it's soul-killing.
     
    OscarMadison likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page