1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Ukraine Always Get What You Want

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by TigerVols, Feb 12, 2022.

  1. TowelWaver

    TowelWaver Well-Known Member

    If it comes to that, then WWIII has already been started, willingly, by Putin himself. He knows where the red line is. As bad as this is, that Rubicon has not been crossed yet.
     
  2. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Where was all this pearl clutching for all of the wars the United States and the rest of NATO have ignored? You do realize there have been quite a few of them, right?
     
    FileNotFound likes this.
  3. Justin_Rice

    Justin_Rice Well-Known Member

    Since 1945, the number of NATO, Warsaw Pact, or countries with nuclear weapons invaded by NATO, the Warsaw Pact, the United States, Russia or anyone else == zero.

    Literally no one ever has been willing to risk nuclear exchange.
     
  4. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    The USA participates in every war, everywhere on this planet, to the extent of its national interest. And this country has participated in every war on this planet since 12/7/41. Sometimes it’s just supplying weapons in a covert manner. Sometimes it’s preventing some country from introducing weapons in a war. Sometimes it providing $3 billion weapon systems. Sometimes it’s putting troops on the ground.
    Our interests in the Ukraine today are greater than our interests in Afghanistan following 9/11. Russia is fucking with international, multinational business and trade . A depression in the US hurts China as much as it hurts. Thank God trump isn’t anywhere near the ability to do something because 1 million Ukrainians would be dead rather than be refugees.
     
  5. WriteThinking

    WriteThinking Well-Known Member

    It was wrong then, too. Does the fact that we've done something before mean that we should necessarily do it again, and be OK with it? Especially if it was something wrong?

    I think I, and many others, too -- including, probably some who have been silent on this thread/site -- have a clearer, better understanding of this "war" than some others, and that has contributed to the "pearl-clutching," as you call it. And it makes things all the more infuriating, tragic and inexplicable.

    This is one man's war, and it's a sheer land grab. There is no "cause." (Even Hitler had a cause), and Putin has now committed war crimes that need to be answered. I'd like to know what anybody's going to do about Putin, if anything, before Ukraine no longer exists, either literally, or on a map.
     
  6. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    We just escaped by the skin of our teeth after having a numb nuts simpleton as president who just did random unhelpful shit after watching TV and fancied himself an expert in everything and could not be told different. You are comically out of your depth here.
     
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2022
    FileNotFound, Slacker and outofplace like this.
  7. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    The United States is participating in this war quite openly, to an extent that in the pre-nuclear era would already mean Russia and the US were at war. We are openly supplying Ukraine with weapons. We are openly sharing intelligence with them that is resulting in the deaths of Russian soldiers. We are leading a worldwide attempt to destroy Russia's economy. All of that is wholly justified, but those have been throughout history acts of war. Putin -- SO FAR -- has accepted the post Hiroshima rules of engagement. If we don't kill each other openly, it's not war.
     
    Hermes likes this.
  8. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    That's not to say we haven't been inches away a few times.
    If we'd invaded Cuba in 1962 it would have happened. The Cubans had low-yield tactical nukes ready to light up our landing craft. There was also a Soviet sub that was ready to launch a nuclear torpedo at an American fleet until one officer talked some sense into another.
    I've mentioned Able Archer 83 a few times. The Soviets were sitting on go, waiting for one false step.
    Russia and China had a brief border war in 1969 that flirted with going nuclear.
    This current situation, I fear, has joined that thankfully brief list.
     
  9. TigerVols

    TigerVols Well-Known Member

    So what happens if/when suddenly and unexpectedly all Russian troops around Kiev high tail it out of there as fast as they can?
    Do we assume a nuke strike is soon coming? Does the USA sit idly by?
     
  10. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    If one nuke flies, they all fly, whether it's aimed at Kyiv, Paris, Prague, London or wherever. At that point this entire discussion becomes moot.
     
  11. Hermes

    Hermes Well-Known Member

    I don’t think that convoy can move, let alone high tail it anywhere.
     
  12. TrooperBari

    TrooperBari Well-Known Member

    Meanwhile, "don't politicize sports!" continues to be the rallying cry of Status Quo Warriors the world over.


     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page