1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Mike Reed Sets Goals for New Gannett

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Readallover, Jan 19, 2021.

  1. Twirling Time

    Twirling Time Well-Known Member

    Editors are just tired of taking shit from one side or the other over something that was published on the edit page. That's what this boils down to, and relevancy is just a convenient excuse.
     
  2. I Should Coco

    I Should Coco Well-Known Member

    It’s a cost cutting move, pure and simple. The fact that opinion pages are less read or too hard to distinguish from news online is window dressing.

    Opinion pages and content for them require a commitment of time and money. Gannett has neither of those things.
     
  3. Twirling Time

    Twirling Time Well-Known Member

    Numerous wire services provide opinion content that Gannett outlets already pay for.

    Paginators spend just as much time laying out an op-ed page as they do a lifestyles page, probably much less.

    It goes back to that Gannett suits don't wanna face the heat from half their readers — either for fear of losing readership or from the drudgery of answering emails and phone calls.
     
    2muchcoffeeman likes this.
  4. Mngwa

    Mngwa Well-Known Member

    If the paper in my town is any indicator, the editorial pages are gone. There are no more op-eds, and they're only running letters to the editor three maybe four times a week
     
  5. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    FTFY.
     
    2muchcoffeeman, SixToe and sgreenwell like this.
  6. Equalizer

    Equalizer Member

  7. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    We'll improve our processes once we toss aside a "breaking news reporter" (i.e. glorified intern or who we'd once call a rewrite guy) who was probably making $31k a year writing trending news stories on USA Today's website. I'm guessing she also had a daily quota to meet.

    This is how you get Jayson Blairs in your newsrooms.

    Edit: I say this not to shame her, but look at her story archive. It's pretty much what you'd expect from someone in her position.

    https://www.usatoday.com/staff/4869305001/gabriela-miranda/
     
  8. Readallover

    Readallover Active Member

    Janet Cooke, Jayson Blair, this person - it never ends and it's never good for how the public perceives the mainstream media.
     
  9. rtse11

    rtse11 Well-Known Member

    They're hiring more of these positions at some of their bigger markets..I think Columbus for sure and maybe Akron
     
  10. Tarheel316

    Tarheel316 Well-Known Member

    Probably not a bad idea. Many readers still don’t know the difference between a story and a column.
     
    Woody Long likes this.
  11. Readallover

    Readallover Active Member

    Do papers even endorse candidates these days? And do candidates come in to meet with the editorial boards that remain, in hopes of getting the paper's endorsement?
     
  12. justgladtobehere

    justgladtobehere Well-Known Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page