1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Biden: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Jan 20, 2021.

  1. DanielSimpsonDay

    DanielSimpsonDay Well-Known Member

    [​IMG]
    Big Jim, former tight end for the Kansas City Chiefs, is outfitted with various whips, chains, and a sexual appetite that will knock your socks off! Big Jim has satisfied women throughout the world, and he has the endorsement of Dinesh D'Souza!
     
    HanSenSE, garrow, MTM and 2 others like this.
  2. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  3. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  4. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    I'd bet folding money that at least some the amici filed by native tribes/nations used "Indian," too. So perhaps the esteemed Pé isn't pointing us to all we need to know.
     
    justgladtobehere likes this.
  5. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    A couple of pulls from the amicus brief filed jointly by the Chickasaw and Choctaw nations:

    "Amici are federally-recognized Indian tribes residing on Reservations in Oklahoma ..."

    "Amici Nations agree with Respondent’s and other amici’s explanations why the Court should not consider the State’s argument that it has concurrent jurisdiction over crimes by non-Indians against Indians in Indian country."

    The first sentence in the brief filed by the Cherokee Nation:

    "Amicus Cherokee Nation (“Nation”) is a federally recognized Indian tribe, residing on a reservation in Oklahoma, on which it protects public safety and prosecutes Indian offenders in the exercise of its inherent sovereign authority."
     
  6. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    "All you really need to know," my ass.
     
  7. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Well, in fairness, the question put forth in the case may have appeared to be whether state law should have jurisdiction over someone convicted of child neglect if they live on a reservation. But the important question was actually what the opinion was going to call the ethnic / racial group of the person who was convicted of child neglect.
     
  8. X-Hack

    X-Hack Well-Known Member

    I know he thinks it's a sick "gotcha" burn but a lot of Native Americans prefer the term "Indians." Additionally, in the context of laws pertaining to Native Americans, it's generally referred to as "Indian Law." Law firms that deal with tribal issues have "Indian Law" departments. At Harvard Law School, they have an Indian Law Program (while they have a Native American Law Students Association):

    https://orgs.law.harvard.edu/nalsa/indian-law-program/

    And the body of federal law is referred to as "Federal Indian Law."

    Not for me to say whether that's how it should be, but it's the term that's used in the legal context.
     
    OscarMadison and doctorquant like this.
  9. micropolitan guy

    micropolitan guy Well-Known Member

  10. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

  11. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    Not the person convicted ... the person neglected.
     
  12. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page