Roe v. Wade to be overturned?

The commerce clause in the U.S. Constitution expressly gives the federal government authority over crossing state lines for whatever, including abortion.

The first woman arrested for doing so will win hands down and will have no shortage of pro bono counsel. Otherwise, the U.S. Constitution is unconstitutional.

 

Tell that to Dred Scott

 

Until this SCOTUS rules on it, no?

 

If this “life begins at conception” stuff becomes the law in many states, does that mean pregnant women can drive in the HOV lane or claim their unborn child on their taxes?

 

Report shows what abortion procedures were most common in Alabama

The portion of the report covering the demographics of women undergoing abortions showed that most were unwed, 20-30 years old and had at least one living child prior to the abortion. It also showed abortions were disproportionately performed on Black women.

 

Anti-aborts will say they’ll happily allow that if it means banning abortion.

My favorite one is to ask if a pregnant inmate can be released from incarceration because her fetus is being unlawfully detained without due process.

 

That pesky separation of church and state.

SCOTUS Justices 'Prayed With' Her -- Then Cited Her Bosses to End Roe

 

And clearly, child support should start at conception.

 

Clothing and schooling would be cheap.

 

Then you are legal to drink and buy cigs in the US at 20 years, three months.

 

I'm asking this seriously — is there any legitimate, credible proposal for this that has been introduced in any state legislature?
I haven't kept up with every political happening in a dozen states where these trigger laws are going into effect. Without going down a rabbit hole of nonsense, it's increasingly difficult these days to filter out what are actual proposals in state legislatures, what is wishful thinking by the looniest of right-wing toons, and what are hysterical left-wing hypotheticals that someone made a random absurd comment about and Twitter ran with it (see the thing about the pregnancy-sniffing dogs in Mississippi).

As you said, it's so blatantly unconstitutional and stupid to consider that kind of law, from a dozen different angles, that I can't see how it would warrant any kind of serious discussion. Yet it keeps popping up as if it's going to an imminent vote in a number of states.