1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Climate Change? Nahhh ...

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Riptide, Oct 23, 2015.

  1. Hermes

    Hermes Well-Known Member

    Stop. Your hysterics are scaring Alma.

    He wants his tank full of gas on a Friday night, a little cash in his pocket, Wolfman Jack on his radio and you to stop talking about this.
     
    dixiehack likes this.
  2. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    The economics of climate change policy is likely to hit middle class families a lot harder than climate change will. But perhaps everyone here is squared away financially. Or perhaps we’re like farmers in Kansas, voting against our economic interests for moral reasons.
     
  3. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

  4. Mngwa

    Mngwa Well-Known Member

    You can't possibly believe that. Climate change, which is blossoming much faster than predicted, is going to make parts of the world uninhabitable, most likely in my child's lifetime. The water wars are coming.
     
  5. Spartan Squad

    Spartan Squad Well-Known Member

    The economics of the policy? I mean why don’t you look at the economics of climate change. Jesus. Try getting fire insurance in California. Try living on the coast in Florida. Or living at all in Arizona. Maldives. But yes, the problem is the policies.
     
    Mngwa likes this.
  6. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

  7. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

  8. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

  9. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

  10. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

  11. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    Yahp. I guess we’ll see if all the water runs out in Kansas.

    You already know I’m a skeptic as to the extent. Not the existence - but the extent. And a skeptic as to the answer, since I think consumption of energy is a far bigger issue than production.

    An ominous super storm presentation - with the NYT running what seems almost like a movie trailer - isn’t alarmism at all. It’s sobriety. So I suppose everyone should get right on moving from CA.
     
  12. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    It’s not going to get any cheaper to live most of those places. (Well, you know more than I about the Maldives.) And I’d expect it’ll get more expensive with new energy policies.

    But perhaps not. Perhaps the solution we need is precisely the solution presented to us by the solution people. Rare is the circumstance where our morals, survival and financial well-being line up so perfectly, but perhaps this is science’s version of the prosperity gospel.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page