1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Ukraine Always Get What You Want

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by TigerVols, Feb 12, 2022.

  1. UPChip

    UPChip Well-Known Member

    Hearts on fire
    Strong desire
    Rages deep within
    Hearts on fire
    Fever's risin', high
    The moment of truth draws near
     
    Baron Scicluna likes this.
  2. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    BTE gonna have to get the garage cleaned out fast.
     
  3. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    We don't have to worry about anyone coming unless USCIS returns from its year-long lunch break. We're so desperate we have our Republican Congressman on the case now. And his constituent representative working with us is a Slavic woman. Maybe that's a good sign.
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2022
  4. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

  5. WriteThinking

    WriteThinking Well-Known Member

    Who would replace Putin? Where would he/she come from? (Honest questions. I just don't know, and am wondering how/why everyone seems to just know that the next leader would only be worse, and would not possibly be better, or, at least, different enough not to want to be at war seemingly just because...).
     
  6. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    The "next guy" would likely be quickly replaced by another guy (you don't want to be the guy who follows "the guy.....' I'm guessing military, until they find someone acceptable. Putin is pushing 70 in any event. Fairly certain he doesn't have a designated "no. 2."
     
  7. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    If he were in Congress, he’d just now be in line to chair a committee for the next decade.
     
    maumann likes this.
  8. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

  9. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

  10. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    The first thing to remember is that any leader the U.S. describes as "better" will be worse for Russia. Always. Just look at the only two Russian leaders the U.S. liked --- one destroyed the USSR; the other destroyed Russia. Any Russian leader who puts Russia's interests first is guaranteed to come into conflict with the U.S.
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2022
  11. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    The USSR was a teetering, economically-stagnating, totalitarian state. It's absurd to suggest that a single person "destroyed" it or that the U.S. liking someone had anything to do with it.

    Time and its own failings destroyed it.
     
  12. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    In a March 1991 referendum asking the following question --- "Do you consider it necessary to preserve the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics as a renewed federation of equal sovereign republics, in which the rights and freedoms of a person of any nationality will be fully guaranteed?" --- 77.8% of the people voted "Yes."

    The people wanted it to continue. The leaders let them down. And the U.S. celebrated wildly --- and continued spiking the football for the next decade.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page