Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
If the cars weren't built like Army M1A2 tanks, if SAFER barriers weren't designed to minimize impacts without creating friction (unlike a rough concrete wall) and Goodyear didn't have protective inner liners, Chastain's move probably wouldn't have worked. As it was, he's damn lucky the crossover gate didn't do a Michael Waltrip/Mike Harmon at Bristol number on him.
But kudos to him for pushing the boundary. It probably had a 10 percent of success. And now NASCAR will come up with some unenforceable rule to stop anybody else, even though there's no other track on the circuit where it would work.
What rule can you create to stop it? There's only one scenario — maybe two if it can get you a win — where that's a good idea, and this was it. You're not going to put yourself hard into the wall to pass somebody on lap 143 of 500, or even win a stage. heck, even if you pull that in the Martinsville spring race your car owner will chew your ass out for tearing up a car. He (somehow) didn't wreck anyone for once or create a caution to allow a teammate to gain position.
It was just a daring, ballsy move that'll be talked about for years if he wins the championship next week. Maybe the most exciting fourth-place finish in NASCAR history.
The discussion I'd heard was simply an edict that you can't gain position from hitting the wall, kind of like how F1 does with track limits. It was an incredible idea and I totally understand why that loophole needs to be closed ASAP.
The other thing that came to mind is J.R. Hildebrand should start telling everyone he meant to do that at Indy.
And the sanctioning body shouldn't do a damn thing with rules or whatever