1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

2023 Baseball Hall of Fame Class

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Della9250, Jul 19, 2022.

  1. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    If only those priests had been so discerning and adamant during the period under discussion.

    A great deal of the upset and confusion over these votes has to do with the Stewards of the Game™ trying to re-virginize themselves long after the fact.

    If the press had reported out the steroid story in real time, none of this would be happening.
     
  2. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    You are so right. And there is a very strong correlation between the purpleness of the prose during the 1998 season and the virulence of the denunciation of "cheaters" ever since. I should also point out that EVERYBODY in baseball, not just the press, were happily sweeping the whole thing under the rug at the time, making the story very difficult to pursue. If Barry Bonds' head hadn't grown so much, they might all still be sweeping it under the rug.
     
  3. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    I think you're failing to grasp that previous.generations NEVER looked at Cooperstown that way. Yes, it was taken seriously. It was NEVER considered a "roadside attraction."

    It was considered the ultimate arbiter of greatness in baseball history.

    Has that changed? It sure has. I don't know if you can expect everyone to shrug their shoulders and gladly accept that it's become less than what it was.
     
    Azrael likes this.
  4. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    As a roadside attraction, the Hall of Fame is fantastic. The museum part of the complex is truly wonderful. As an arbiter of baseball greatness, it sucks, and it kinda sucked long before PEDs hit the scene to fuck it for good and all.
     
  5. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member


    It's not that it's less than it was.

    This is what it always was.
     
  6. CD Boogie

    CD Boogie Well-Known Member

    Frankly, I don't know how the current system could be improved, other than just letting me make all the decisions about who is inducted or not ;)

    Seriously, between the verdicts on Bonds, Clemens and Schilling rendered first by the BBWAA and then by their peers/contemporaries, what else is left? Voting by the masses? If so, will early voting be allowed? Or only same-day voting? And will the candidates announce beforehand that they will accept the voting results? Or will Bonds supporters be storming the Hall on induction day?

    The people have spoken, hypocritical though they may seem or be. They don't want to honor Bonds, Clemens and Schilling.
     
  7. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    Not the people, or in this case, the customers. The Prime Directive of the Hall of Fame is "keep the fans out of it." It is by and for those inside baseball, not outside. We're (OK, I'm an outcast insider) merely supposed to gape in awe.
     
  8. CD Boogie

    CD Boogie Well-Known Member

    Thank god for that. It's why this country is a republic and not a direct democracy.
     
  9. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    The Hall could do the whole selection thing with an anonymous panel 0f half a dozen qualified baseball historians.

    It chooses to do this instead.
     
  10. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    If fans elected people to vote for the Hall, it'd be the US system. Baseball's system is more like feudalism. There are grants of limited power within a structured hierarchy, but the peasants have no say at all.
     
  11. CD Boogie

    CD Boogie Well-Known Member

    If fans voted -- like they did in 1999 for the All-Century Team -- we'd end up with Mark McGwire on the team, while the experts would have to clean it up and add Honus Wagner, Stan Musial, Lefty Grove, Warren Spahn, and Christy Mathewson.

    The fans are idiots. See the All-Star Game, which is why they came up with the All-MLB team.
     
    cyclingwriter2 likes this.
  12. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    Fans are into what they see on the field, not so much baseball history (a significant minority of them care about that, of course). That's a valid perspective, albeit a limited one IMO. But the reason fans are excluded from even a limited role in Hall selection is that they don't give a shit about being guardians of the holy shrine. They'd put Bonds, Clemens and even Pete Rose in in a heartbeat. Is that wrong? Depends on what you think a Hall of Fame is for.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page