1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Biden: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Jan 20, 2021.

  1. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    It would be very unlikely the Supreme Court would rule for Congress in this dispute, as it would set a precedent that a future Congress could investigate it.
     
  2. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    Sad that we're down to that being what protects the Constitution, isn't it?
     
  3. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  4. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    It's how the Founders envisioned political conflict when they wrote the thing. It was their assumption that the three branches of government would exist in a perpetual tension in which they'd defend their own rights as a first principle, thus preventing any one branch from gaining too much power over the other two. It's often said that the Founders never envisioned political parties, but that can't be true, as they were already long established in Great Britain. I think what's more true is that they never envisioned the USA being governed by any but the men of property/unusually learned for the time elite they were.
     
    Octave and Neutral Corner like this.
  5. TigerVols

    TigerVols Well-Known Member

    Except those founders didn’t foresee members of a branch putting loyalty to party over loyalty to the separation of powers. So counting on SCOTUS to choose their self-interests over those of the current GOP is risky.
     
    tapintoamerica likes this.
  6. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    For all its foresight , the Constitution was originally bereft of at least one bit of direction: presidential succession. All those great minds looked at their work and presumably asked, “Hey, guys. Have we left anything out?” And they said, “Nah. We’re good.”
     
  7. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    Presidential election, too. They didn't foresee the Jefferson-Burr tie of 1800, leading to the 12th Amendment.
     
    tapintoamerica likes this.
  8. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member


    Or Mighty Merrick decides he should should order all DOJ operatives to comply with each and every request of the committee, so as to avoid the slightest little hint of political favoritism. Such a gesture of goodwill could bring a tidal wave of unity from right wing media.
     
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2023
  9. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    Yeah, the original arrangement, which had the runner-up in the election become vice-president and thus have a direct personal incentive for the president to become dead, was not a real good idea. Remember that any time anybody says the founding fathers who wrote the constitution were eternal geniuses.
     
  10. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Brazilian Congress getting overrun today.

     
  11. micropolitan guy

    micropolitan guy Well-Known Member

  12. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

    Rioto de Janeiro Oito

    What a sin
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page