1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Economy

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by TigerVols, May 14, 2020.

  1. Justin_Rice

    Justin_Rice Well-Known Member


    VR has been in the, "we're just a couple of breakthroughs away from this taking over the world!" stage for about a decade now, and that breakthrough hasn't come. I think check writers are losing patience.

    I know I still can't use VR for more than about five minutes without feeling motion sickness, regardless how good the framerates are.

    But also, I'm sure it's the Fed's fault.
     
    2muchcoffeeman and sgreenwell like this.
  2. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

  3. sgreenwell

    sgreenwell Well-Known Member

    It definitely improves every couple of years, but you're right about the headsets still being too big and too expensive, and the "feel" still being too odd, for widespread adoption to happen.
     
  4. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

  5. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

  6. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Their market research found that there is $5 billion worth of students who want to cheat on their term papers, and another $5 billion worth of Russian agents assigned to spread misinformation. They figure the investment will pay for itself by the 2024 election.
     
  7. sgreenwell

    sgreenwell Well-Known Member

    Man, I kind of think that's cheap for the potential of that. They already have DALL-E and OpenAI plugging along, and the things it can do are only going to get more robust as time goes on.
     
  8. TigerVols

    TigerVols Well-Known Member

    It IS cheap. ChatGPT is revolutionary, not evolutionary. The things I'm doing with it after just two weeks of use have convinced me of that.
     
    Azrael and sgreenwell like this.
  9. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member


    While I agree the AI / Machine Learning is a growth area for business, I'd say the things we're seeing now are evolutionary. We arrived at ChatGPT thanks to HG Wells and Fritz Lang and Alan Turing. The History of Artificial Intelligence - Science in the News

    Turing's breakthrough paper was published in 1950. https://redirect.cs.umbc.edu/courses/471/papers/turing.pdf
     
    OscarMadison likes this.
  10. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    I look forward to Ragu’s 5,000-word post refuting this.

     
  11. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    I'll beat that by a factor of 10^-3 ... "What a crock of shit."
     
    OscarMadison and Azrael like this.
  12. Twirling Time

    Twirling Time Well-Known Member

    Ragu wouldn't know a 3-point hitch from a cattle cube. I doubt he'll contribute much more than a blind support of Big Agra.
     
    2muchcoffeeman likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page