1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Plain Dealer drops Dilbert

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by HanSenSE, Feb 25, 2023.

  1. OscarMadison

    OscarMadison Well-Known Member

    Word in fandom circles is Adams has been nuts for years. He thinks reality isn't real and he's writing the simulation. I thought he might be trolling. Maybe not.
     
    sgreenwell and Azrael like this.
  2. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    A martyr to cancel culture?
     
    OscarMadison likes this.
  3. OscarMadison

    OscarMadison Well-Known Member

    Depends on who you ask. More along the lines of solipsistic village idiot, really.
     
    Azrael likes this.
  4. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member


    But isn't this exactly the way a solipsistic idiot would try to make himself a martyr to Cancel Culture?

    It is!

     
    Last edited: Feb 26, 2023
    OscarMadison likes this.
  5. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

  6. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

  7. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    As anyone who worked at a newspaper that was so foolhardy as to tinker with its comics section knows, nothing is more fraught with peril. People who read the comics do so with fanatical loyalty, even if the strip they follow completely sucks and is drawn and/or written by the great-great-great nephew of its creator. Dilbert hasn't been funny for some time, like a decade, but had it been canceled on those grounds, reader fury would have erupted. I mean, Charles Shultz has been dead for 20 years, and there are still papers who print reruns of Peanuts, because there are still readers who want it. Also, it is noteworthy how few editors in top newspaper management read the funnies themselves. This has been true since the '70 and '80s when papers were riding high. I'll bet more than a few papers now canceling Dilbert had management unaware the paper carried it.
     
    Last edited: Feb 26, 2023
  8. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

  9. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    He also threw this on the fire:


    No doubt the "but freedum of speech" crowd will latch onto this soon. And although it's been said, many times, many ways, Hearst, Advance, Lee, ect. are free not to give him a platform.
     
  10. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    The thing is - if someone wants to find a daily Dilbert strip - it's probably easier online than it would be to find a copy of the local paper in any event.
     
  11. Bud_Bundy

    Bud_Bundy Well-Known Member

    We did a comics survey 15 or 20 years ago and one or two of the strips showed very little readership. Once they were cancelled, though, the crazies came out of the woodwork. I'd rather take a phone call from a pissed-off soccer mom that some of those idiots.
     
    Fred siegle and HanSenSE like this.
  12. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    In the spirit of the thread: does the punishment fit the crime?
     
    OscarMadison likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page