1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Elon Musk takes over Twitter

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Alma, Apr 25, 2022.

  1. UPChip

    UPChip Well-Known Member

    Sounds like they told Elon to suck their "Schweddy Balls."
     
    HanSenSE, Deskgrunt50 and Fred siegle like this.
  2. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    Most of the "government funding" public media gets is to make sure there are FM translators in Rural Ruralfuck, Wyo., so there is at least one audible source of news on the FM dial and people can hear if a natural disaster is headed their way.
     
  3. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    priceless

    Screenshot 2023-04-13 at 11.45.35 AM.png
     
    OscarMadison and Neutral Corner like this.
  4. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

  5. poindexter

    poindexter Well-Known Member

    Sounds like what a pedo would say. Hmm.
     
    wicked and PCLoadLetter like this.
  6. justgladtobehere

    justgladtobehere Well-Known Member

    Sure. Public radio is a real hot out in the sticks. The station running crappy syndicated country is doing better.
     
  7. Oggiedoggie

    Oggiedoggie Well-Known Member

    Might be best to just rebrand as a right wing screech machine.

    CritterSM.jpeg
     
  8. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Depends on what part of NPR you’re talking about. The national version? Probably not. The local part comprised of crop reports and music geared to local tastes (we get the blues all Friday night, bluegrass all Saturday night and local music on Sundays) is popular.
     
    wicked likes this.
  9. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  10. FileNotFound

    FileNotFound Well-Known Member

    Elon Musk sucks, but let’s dial back the “potentially life-saving” thing just a bit. Twitter is nobody’s only source of weather warnings.
     
  11. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Thank you for this.

    He is an unstable douchebag and attention seeker. But at the same time, the level of scrutiny for everything Twitter related now is minute.

    Twitter was not a great business before he bought it. It was dying a very slow death. He hastened that death with the amount of debt he loaded the balance sheet up with (to do a highly leveraged purchase of the company). And he had no plan behind any of this, so it has left him flailing. ... he needs for the company to be something that it isn't, in order to generate income that it doesn't. That is the root of all the changes. ... the laying off so many people, trying to sell anything that isn't bolted down, trying to monetize everything. He has no choice, actually, because if he kept Twitter the way it was, he may not have destroyed the company as quickly as all of his missteps are now doing it, but it was guaranteed failure with the debt load he has taken on. He will likely fail magnificently either way, but at least if he slings enough shit and tries enough things, some of things might work and solve what is a very dire and serious cash flow problem.

    That is the context you need to understand surrounding him wanting to monetize Twitter's API. He needs the company to earn money that it doesn't. It may backfire on him. ... for example, if there are a lot of people going to a twitter feed to see when the next New York City subway is going to be arriving to time their walk to a station, he is going to lose those users. But how valuable were those users ever? An ad-based model isn't lucrative enough to drive the cash flow he needs with all the debt he took on, and that is the only thing about those users that has been remotely monetizable.

    I see three things: 1) He is flailing. He bit off way more than he can chew, and he has no good plan for making it work. 2) In the course of his flailing, he has done a lot of things that are backfiring on him because his desperate attempts to monetize some things are badly hurting the brand and doing more aggregate harm than good. 3) This actually may not be one of those things: There are two potential benefits, getting rid of annoying bots (which users will like) and generating income for him. It will be bad for him in the long run if it has the opposite effect of making it so that a lot of useful information leaves Twitter and the ones willing to pay for the API are going to clog the service with marketing and crap.
     
  12. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page