1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Mike Reed Sets Goals for New Gannett

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Readallover, Jan 19, 2021.

  1. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    Places that hire minority fill-in-the-blanks aren’t well run.

    Places that hire very talented people who happen to be from a different background are the smart ones.
     
  2. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

  3. rtse11

    rtse11 Well-Known Member

    You can insert dozens of other properties for the Register-Guard and the story is the same.
     
    PaperDoll likes this.
  4. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    I don’t want to hear jack shit about gutting newspapers from an Advance/Newhouse property.
     
    I Should Coco likes this.
  5. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    I found the problem.


    Clearly, Gannett is not the only media company that had to make deep cost cuts over the past few decades. The rise of the Internet and iPhone lured readers and advertisers away from newspapers. In response, news operations across the country dramatically downsized.

    But few media companies have shown Gannett’s willingness to cut staff to skeletal levels. Three times in 2022 alone, the word went out from corporate that more “cost management” steps would be necessary across the chain, which includes its flagship USA Today. Since 2019, total employment has declined from 21,255 to 11,200.​
     
  6. I Should Coco

    I Should Coco Well-Known Member

    Agree 100%.

    That was a strong story about the demise of the Register-Guard, but all the Oregonian guy could say is “I think we’re turning a corner” without any numbers to back that up.

    In other words, exactly what Reed is claiming about Gannet.
     
  7. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    It’s been obvious for years what Gannett’s and the other newspaper corporations’ goal is. Suck up as much money as they can get; pay out bonuses to the suits, then declare bankruptcy and leave the suckers, er, creditors, holding worthless newspapers while they move on to the next industry that they can strip-mine.

    They’re the aliens from Independence Day. The only difference is that Gannett pays lip-service to the place they’re destroying unlike the aliens who made no bones about what they were going to do.
     
    Last edited: May 21, 2023
  8. Twirling Time

    Twirling Time Well-Known Member

  9. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    Mike Reed's new goal: Cash a Gannett check on July 1.
     
  10. Human_Paraquat

    Human_Paraquat Well-Known Member

    So much of this resonated with my experience in Gannett. Joined a paper in 2005 that had eight full-time staffers in sports. When I left in 2019, we had eight in the entire newsroom, including editors, photogs, etc.

    In comparison, my new employer has raised salaries consistently, added multi-person beats and to my knowledge has not laid off anyone since well before the pandemic. But this employer actually puts its money where its mouth is on digital first, as opposed to the lip service going on at Gannett.
     
  11. matt_garth

    matt_garth Well-Known Member

  12. rtse11

    rtse11 Well-Known Member

    I wish them all the success possible, only because I want my former colleagues to be have a job in the next few years. It's not like any of them will see salary increases but ...
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page