1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Elon Musk takes over Twitter

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Alma, Apr 25, 2022.

  1. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    “One dollar, Bob!”
     
  2. TigerVols

    TigerVols Well-Known Member

    Fronts for Saudi Arabia, China, Russia or a conglomeration of all three would pay $100 billion plus for it. Therefore, its value is $100 billion plus!
     
    wicked likes this.
  3. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    I am sure there are plenty of people with $100 billion that is meaningless to them. ... and comes with having to get the colonoscopy below once or twice a year. ... along with the constant threat that you might be shut down at any moment making your $100 billion completely vanish.

    [​IMG]
     
  4. DanielSimpsonDay

    DanielSimpsonDay Well-Known Member

  5. Regan MacNeil

    Regan MacNeil Well-Known Member

    LOL. His last name ... *chef's kiss*
     
  6. Regan MacNeil

    Regan MacNeil Well-Known Member

    Twitter's lawyers in federal court (a thread):

     
  7. Octave

    Octave Well-Known Member

    I know we can all depend on What Is a Woman? being posted here just as soon as it makes its Twitter world premiere (pronounces it prem-YAY!!! like Tony Robinson)
     
  8. Della9250

    Della9250 Well-Known Member

  9. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    Learned nothing from what happened to Fox, huh?
     
  10. swingline

    swingline Well-Known Member

    So YouTube is going after the people you wouldn’t invite to Sunday dinner? Cool cool.
     
  11. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Fox would be fine if they had just made false election claims without defaming anyone. It was the defamation that got them into civil legal trouble.

    Also, Fox and Youtube are not comparable things. Fox controls (and creates) what airs on its network. Youtube offers people a platform where they post their own content. Not that there is, or should be, any liability for posting bullshit on social media. ... but if there was, the people who created the content should be liable for anything about it, not the platform they used.
     
  12. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    Should be subject to the same defamation laws every media organization is. If they’re sued into oblivion, so be it.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page