1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Should we "fight every day to save our democracy?"

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Mr. X, Aug 8, 2023.

  1. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member


    Journalists should care.
     
    PaperDoll likes this.
  2. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    Mark Singer agrees. Who are the other 23?
     
  3. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    Had Hillary won in 2016, Trump could have run against her --- and beaten her --- in 2020 (they would have blamed her for COVID, and parties almost never win four consecutive terms). And we'd be dealing with an incumbent Trump today . . . with what democrat to challenge him?
     
    tapintoamerica likes this.
  4. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    So your argument is that in a nation of 335 million people, only two dozen care about the nature and quality of reporting on Donald Trump?

    OK.

    I'd certainly add Tim O'Brien to that short short list.

    Not sure that's a journalism question.
     
  5. Mr._Graybeard

    Mr._Graybeard Well-Known Member

    When newspapers had enough personnel to do an adequate job, they would set the agenda for other media. Radio and TV would regularly pick up on news that the papers broke, giving their impact a multiplier. Now I seldom see local TV news follow newspaper reports.
     
    I Should Coco likes this.
  6. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    That wasn't really what you said.

    There could have been a thousand dozen reporters carefully and critically reporting on Trump over the decades, and he still would have won.

    Journalists weren't stopping the Don Train in 2016.
     
    Liut and Azrael like this.
  7. BYH 2: Electric Boogaloo

    BYH 2: Electric Boogaloo Well-Known Member

    COVID never happens at this level--or maybe at all--with competent American leadership, or at the very least someone who doesn't insist all will be well by Easter.
     
  8. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    It was the "nature and quality of the reporting" that led Trump from Queens to Atlantic City to Studio 54 to the escalator to the Oval Office.
     
  9. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    Sure it does. Red states/counties would have opposed shutdowns BECAUSE Hillary ostensibly would have been for them. "Government overreach!!!!!!'' DeSantis still would have been DeSantis, etc.

    People in this country react IN OPPOSITION to the leader as much as they react with him/her.
     
  10. BYH 2: Electric Boogaloo

    BYH 2: Electric Boogaloo Well-Known Member

    No chance for two reasons. Without a complete fucking moron goading them on from the White House, the red state dummies aren't opposing shutdowns, vaccinations, etc.

    More importantly, Hillary would have been intelligent enough to prepare us for this, if it even happened, and greatly minimize the impact. Even George W. Bush, previously the dumbest simpleton and most nightmarish person to occupy the White House, was consumed by pandemic preparation.

    George W. Bush in 2005: 'If we wait for a pandemic to appear, it will be too late to prepare'
     
  11. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    Yes, and it has nothing to do with Trump. It has to do with Kansas.
     
  12. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    I vehemently disagree.

    The grievance machine has been in high gear for a long time now. Opposition is a reflex. They would oppose literally everything that came out of Hillary’s mouth.

    They were anti-vaxx during the last pandemic, too. By a wide margin.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page