1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Running shooting thread 2023

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Slacker, Jan 3, 2023.

  1. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    Brilliant.
     
    dixiehack likes this.
  2. Deskgrunt50

    Deskgrunt50 Well-Known Member

    It takes a lot to break through with a cover these days. This is incredibly well done.
     
    dixiehack and I Should Coco like this.
  3. I Should Coco

    I Should Coco Well-Known Member

    Barricades. Ultra high tech security systems. Metal detectors. Firearms training for facility and staff.

    All of this, but never the most obvious and effective solution: keeping guns out of the hands of crazy people.
     
    OscarMadison and HanSenSE like this.
  4. Big Circus

    Big Circus Well-Known Member

    That's a hell of a front.
     
  5. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    I think most college towns would be/are better served by campus papers than they are the local rag.

    And I'll say it, you think the UNC paper does that front if they had decent art? Really? But really a good plan B.
     
    Last edited: Aug 30, 2023
  6. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    Funny though. If you want to find a place with solid security against some crazy shooting the place up, go visit a state legislature, Congress, or a courthouse. The places where people make the gun laws and legal interpretations that don't even attempt to control the crazies with guns, that's where security is tight.
     
    OscarMadison and I Should Coco like this.
  7. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

  8. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    New Mexico's governor issued an emergency order banning anyone from carrying guns in Albuquerque for the next 30 days, then tries to explain her reasoning by saying the Constitution — either the First or Second Amendment, and probably others — doesn't matter.
    Then she acknowledges that the order is pointless because criminals aren't going to obey it, but still doesn't give a shit.
    "Do you really think that criminals are going to hear this message and not carry a gun in Albuquerque for 30 days?"
    "Uhhhh ... No. But here's what I do think. It's a pretty resounding message."

    She also suggested that concealed carry permit holders, who presumably are law-abiding citizens, "maybe should be" arrested.

    Governor bans carrying guns in Albuquerque after 11-year-old killed

     
  9. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

    Good move. Just like Republicans passing unconstitutional laws and then letting the courts fight them out.
     
    2muchcoffeeman likes this.
  10. OscarMadison

    OscarMadison Well-Known Member

    We saw what happened when discourse turned to, "Let's teach women how not to be raped." Now, it's "Lets teach children how not to be shot.
    We see what you're doing there.
     
    2muchcoffeeman likes this.
  11. WriteThinking

    WriteThinking Well-Known Member

    Eh, this doesn't bother me. Regardless of the letter of the law, I like the spirit of the order.

    Have at it. See what happens.
     
  12. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    The spirit of the order -- that the governor thinks it's OK to take a crowbar to the Constitution and believes no part of it is immune to that approach -- is what's so troubling.
     
    2muchcoffeeman likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page