1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Running NHL 2023-24 regular season thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Regan MacNeil, Oct 10, 2023.

  1. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    Boy, I just don't know. And I really mean that -- maybe it was intentional, maybe it wasn't. I just don't know.

    I also don't know what "suspicion of manslaughter" entails in England.

    Graphic video.

     
  2. Smallpotatoes

    Smallpotatoes Well-Known Member

    When I went to college in Hartford, someone sold T-shirts with Mickey Mouse holding up a middle finger saying “Hey Hartford!”

    The Hurricanes might as well be wearing sweaters with that logo.
     
  3. Smallpotatoes

    Smallpotatoes Well-Known Member

    That’s ridiculous. Bunch of racists who never played the game started squawking and he’s arrested just to appease them.
     
  4. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    There are plenty of racists taking this opportunity to shit all over the black player. There also plenty of people who have played the game who think there was some intent there. Not to cut his throat, obviously but to hurt him. I lean to a really bad accident.
     
  5. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    I have to agree with you. It is certainly possible that it was intentional. I don't know why his leg would come up like that if not to try to hurt him. Maybe it was just a horrible accident, but I can certainly see why people would argue otherwise.
     
  6. ChrisLong

    ChrisLong Well-Known Member

    JFC.
    Just got home from the game. Looking for an explanation.



    Disputed goal at 9:20
     
  7. Spartan Squad

    Spartan Squad Well-Known Member

    Refs ruled it didn’t fully cross the line and there wasn’t enough to change it? That video it is hard to see if the puck fully crossed. It probably did, but you need more than probably to call it a goal.
     
    JC likes this.
  8. ChrisLong

    ChrisLong Well-Known Member

    One of the stop-action replays showed the puck so far over the goal line, the video crew drew in a red line between the puck and the goal line. Goalie Stolarz missed jamming his skate into the post and his leg was back in the goal. The puck was on edge and shoved against his pad. It was clearly a goal. And the refs took at least 5 minutes staring into the iPad to determine it wasn't. When the review took so long, I knew the Ducks were in trouble. You know, it takes time for Toronto to reach Bettman at that hour for a ruling.

    [​IMG]
     
  9. Sea Bass

    Sea Bass Well-Known Member

    Are you presenting this as conclusive evidence?
     
  10. Regan MacNeil

    Regan MacNeil Well-Known Member

  11. ChrisLong

    ChrisLong Well-Known Member

    This one is clearer. There are others even clearer. If you are questioning this, it's because you just want to argue. There is no question the puck crossed the goal line.


    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2023
  12. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    League hates the ducks I guess.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page