President Biden: The NEW one and only politics thread

They can sue. They can also lose and be out a shitpot of money for lawyer fees and probably pay for Biden and Clinton's lawyers as well.

 

Why do MAGAs think precedent is a thing?

Trump’s cases happened in a vacuum and have no bearing on other cases.

 

I don't know. Why don't we check in with Scott Adams or Hatman or whatever other dipshit du jour you want to bring up for God knows what reason to make whatever idiotic point you think you are making.

 

Can't speak to Reade, but Broderick was extensively interviewed by Ken Starr's team (not a Clinton-friendly bunch) and they decided she was not a reliable enough witness to pursue the matter.

 

Learn to suffer fools.

 

Funny how headlines work.

GOP legislatures in some states seek ways to undermine voters' ability to determine abortion rights


Mississippi House passes resolution to restore ballot initiative

https://magnoliatribune.com/2024/01...sses-resolution-to-restore-ballot-initiative/


House passes ballot initiative proposal that would prevent voters from using it to change abortion ban

https://mississippitoday.org/2024/01/24/house-ballot-initiative-abortion-restriction/

 

Yes I need to be more patient with you. My apologies.

 

If a moderator asks me to stop doing something, I’ll stop.

 

See also: Biden is a pedo, ect. Anything that deflects off TFG.

 

This fucker.

"As Biden tries to assert the success of his presidency, Manchin says he shaped “everything” in the president’s agenda. In an interview with CNN as he drove in New Hampshire, Manchin said the country would have been worse off if he hadn’t used the 50-50 Senate to force Biden to do things his way, arguing, “The way it was presented and the way it ended up are two different things.”

Joe Manchin could upend Biden’s reelection campaign – and blow up No Labels along the way | CNN Politics

 

I’m confused on who “Joe Manchin” voters actually are. Buncha second cousins to Harvey the Rabbit.