1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

O.J. Simpson -- dead

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by BitterYoungMatador2, Apr 11, 2024.

  1. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    Clark and Darden made so many weekend trips to San Francisco during the trial they were practically regulars in Herb Caen's column.
     
  2. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    DNA evidence is complicated, but certain. They should have spent as little time as possible on it --- to establish that the DNA evidence shows that there is a 0.000001% chance somebody other than O.J. Simpson could have committed the murders.

    Instead, they gave a fucking NINE-WEEK biology lesson to a bored-out-of-their-minds jury. You show 108 exhibits . . . and somebody on the other side is going to find something that looks amiss.
     
  3. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    Was their thing that well known at the time? I don’t remember hearing about it until afterward. Seems like it should’ve been exposed earlier.
     
  4. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    As any of my fellow members in Northern California will attest, not a lot got past Herb Caen during his career.
     
    maumann likes this.
  5. Webster

    Webster Well-Known Member

    The OJ defense rested on the argument that the cops were so racist that within hours after the murder, with no idea where he even was at the time(in LA or with an ironclad alibi), they planted evidence incriminating him. Leaving aside the fact that the cops loved him as a celebrity and turned a blind eye to his wife beating, they would never have risked their careers on such a speculative notion.
     
  6. poindexter

    poindexter Well-Known Member

    Have you recently had a head injury?
     
  7. WriteThinking

    WriteThinking Well-Known Member

    This is a really good point. There is such a thing as over-analyzing and over-explaining.
     
  8. Dog8Cats

    Dog8Cats Well-Known Member

    From my brain to your keyboard. Thank you for posting.
     
  9. X-Hack

    X-Hack Well-Known Member

    I was born almost a decade after the Cuban Missile Crisis, but I’d imagine it was pretty memorable when JFK announced to the nation that there were missiles in Cuba and the US had imposed a quarantine. Unless I’m mistaken, the public wasn’t aware of the crisis until his Oval Office address, correct?
     
  10. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    I'm pretty sure that was the case. I was 4 at the time and I was aware that the crisis was going on, because my wire-editor dad and my former small daily editor mom discussed the noon edition and the CBS noon news every time he came home for lunch, and I could read headlines, but my grasp of the situation was, "mean man in Russia wants to put rockets close enough to blow us up and Mr President JFK says no."

    At one point dad and mom were discussing if there were any options if the sirens went off. Both our grandparents' houses were no good because they were located in or near major manufacturing centers, so they'd get hit. We were also located near factories and government centers so we'd be an early target too. One grandma had a cottage up on the lake, but 10 miles from an air force base so that was out too. I think the conclusion was if worse came to worse, we'd just head "up north."

    I do know my mom packed up a big carton of canned food and had it ready to go "just in case." (Mostly crap I hated to eat.)

    I believe JFK announced the Soviets had agreed to stand down in an evening TV address. As I recall, my parents were acting like we might have to take off at any time when I went to bed one night, and by the next morning people were acting like it was gonna be OK.
     
    X-Hack likes this.
  11. qtlaw

    qtlaw Well-Known Member

    I’m just repeating what my Black friends said to me, “we got one at least!” That’s what the black jurors said too. I won’t pretend to know what it felt like at that time.

    I personally felt he was guilty beyond any reasonable doubt.
     
  12. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Yup. A lot of people felt that way. I personally find it ridiculously misguided. A fresh injustice doesn't fix (or even give retribution for) your perceived past injustices. It just creates a whole other injustice.

    Either way, the the verdict didn't hurt the LAPD, it hurt the families of the people he killed, and more broadly it damaged the justice system. I don't want to overstate that, though. Our justice system has always allowed guilty people to be found not guilty. This part I can live with gladly. It's not nearly as bad to me as the innocent people who end up getting sent to prison.
     
    SFIND likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page