1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Muh Muh Muh My Corona (virus)

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Twirling Time, Jan 21, 2020.

  1. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Seems to me not much has changed since this was published.

    https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mbio.00583-23

    It is worthwhile to consider what type of evidence would definitively rule in or rule out either the zoonotic or lab leak hypothesis. Scientific evidence alone is likely to be insufficient to provide a definitive answer (1). In fact, the types of evidence needed for ruling in and out the two hypotheses are quite different. Establishing the lab leak hypothesis would require evidence that the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) was working on a CoV very closely related to the original Wuhan strain, and such evidence would have to come from laboratory records. Had the WIV been working on such a virus, evidence of a laboratory accident and/or that some of the initial cases had come from individuals at the WIV would strongly support the possibility of a lab leak. While the Chinese government has denied that such work was being done by the WIV, transparency is lacking (2). Unless such evidence is forthcoming, the laboratory leak hypothesis cannot be confirmed. Conclusively establishing the zoonotic hypothesis requires finding evidence of the original animal-to-human infection event(s). This is difficult because these events likely occurred unnoticed, and there may be no record of their eventuality. However, the recovery of a CoV that is closely related to SARS-CoV-2 from bats and/or intermediate hosts would support the hypothesis that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was initiated by a zoonotic event. As discussed below, however, the needed exploration of multiple species for CoV prevalence and diversity will take time to achieve.
    In addition to requiring very different sources of data, we must realize that the levels of certainty required to definitively prove either the lab leak or the zoonotic hypothesis differ significantly. Specifically, it should be possible to rule in or out the lab leak theory with information from the WIV, if such information exists. In contrast, unequivocally ruling in or out the zoonotic explanation is not possible since the evidence will always depend on certain probabilities, and certainty is impossible without knowledge of the initial events.
     
    2muchcoffeeman likes this.
  2. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    That is spot on.

    it comes down to which is more compelling. We have zero evidence this virus jumped from an animal to humans. Circumstantially, though, the virus surfaced near the only level 4 virology lab in China, which was studying the closest known relative to this coronavirus and which a number of other scientists had been expressing concerns over its lax protocols. And the Chinese government has refused to be transparent about what was going on in that lab. Does that prove that the virus came out of that lab? Certainly not. But there is certainly some smoke.
     
  3. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    To the families of the millions killed by this thing, the origin doesn't matter. Their loved ones are dead. Same for the folks who have/had long COVID.

    This BS comes up every four to six months and people claim to have new evidence and certifiable answers, but they don't. I stopped caring about the stupidity years ago.
     
    2muchcoffeeman and matt_garth like this.
  4. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    I don't think it is stupid. Knowing the origin of the virus has implications for how we deal with future viruses and pandemics. If it was a zoonatic leap, knowing how that leap happened has important implications. If it was due to carelessness in a virology lab, we all have an interest in trying to force protocols on labs in the future to try to make sure another accident doesn't happen.
     
  5. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    Better stop em.

    America has serious culture war issues. It does. COVID exacerbated them for sure. We're prone to believing some of the worst things about each other.
     
  6. Octave

    Octave Well-Known Member

    And Slobbo loves to stoke the embers.

    Trump has given the Democratic Party more money than I ever have.
     
  7. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    Are we sure about that? If it was a lab leak, and people weren't transparent about it being a leak - that lack of transparency potentially costing us solutions or more efficient solutions. I have to think accountability would matter, just as it would for a victim of Bernie Madoff who lost all their money. They don't get their money back, but there's accountability. That matters, doesn't it?
     
  8. Deskgrunt50

    Deskgrunt50 Well-Known Member

    I doubt we’ll ever know for certain how it happened. What I do know? The chucklefuck trumplicans who put on another embarrassing, disgusting show today with Fauci have absolutely no interest in actually finding out.

    They’ll continue to scoop up their own shit and smear it around as long as they have a microphone and platform.
     
    Last edited: Jun 3, 2024
  9. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    Ultimately, Trumpists are not mad at Fauci because a lab that accepted US dollars may have played with fire and burned the planet. They are mad at Fauci because he believes that in times of full-blown viral infestation, responsible humans place restraints on their public presence. Also: vaccines.
     
  10. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Who let these nut jobs into the hearing?

    x.com
     
    matt_garth likes this.
  11. Webster

    Webster Well-Known Member

    Trump is a conspiracy theorist (Scalia was murdered, Obama birth certificate, etc) who also is such a massive egotist that he thinks that Covid was created to harm him. It allowed the basest instincts of his party (which is now his party) to spread all sorts of rumors. Very real questions can and should be asked about how the pandemic was handled but everything has been overwhelmed by the GOP mountain of bullshit.
     
    Smallpotatoes and dixiehack like this.
  12. Smallpotatoes

    Smallpotatoes Well-Known Member

    The “credibility matters” dipshits are claiming he admitted the 6-foot rule was made up.

    He didn’t.

    x.com
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page