1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Running SCOTUS thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by 2muchcoffeeman, Jun 15, 2020.

Page 34 of 56
  1. justgladtobehere

    justgladtobehere Well-Known Member

    Just spinning out the decision so you can find in it your worst nightmare isn't very honest. There is nothing unique or that requires individual creative expression to rent an apartment to one person and not another.
     
    justgladtobehere, Jul 4, 2023
    #397
  2. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Inky_Wretch, Jul 12, 2023
    #398
  3. Della9250

    Della9250 Well-Known Member



    29 decisions still to come
     
    Della9250, Jun 12, 2024
    #399
  4. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Thomas is waiting on the 2025 RV models to be released before writing any opinions.
     
    Inky_Wretch, Jun 12, 2024
    #400
    Fred siegle, Tarheel316, garrow and 2 others like this.
  5. BitterYoungMatador2

    BitterYoungMatador2 Well-Known Member

    Sheeeeeeeeeeeeit. Clarence calls the factory and custom orders his vehicles now.
     
    BitterYoungMatador2, Jun 12, 2024
    #401
  6. goalmouth

    goalmouth Well-Known Member

    Shouldn't this thread be merged with the religion thread?
     
    goalmouth, Jun 12, 2024
    #402
    Twirling Time likes this.
  7. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    And it still won't be enough.
     
    Neutral Corner, Jun 12, 2024
    #403
  8. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Inky_Wretch, Jun 13, 2024
    #404
  9. MileHigh

    MileHigh Moderator Staff Member

    I believe all three rulings today were unanimous.
     
    MileHigh, Jun 13, 2024
    #405
  10. MileHigh

    MileHigh Moderator Staff Member

    Bump stock case is out.

    SCOTUS blog: The question in this case is whether a bumpstock (an accessory for a semi-automatic rifle that allows the shooter to rapidly reengage the trigger to fire very quickly) converts the rifle into a machinegun. The court holds that it does not.

    6-3.
     
    MileHigh, Jun 14, 2024
    #406
  11. Regan MacNeil

    Regan MacNeil Well-Known Member

    Yep. One sane case and the rest are going to be batshit. I hope Trump enjoys his impending immunity from this corrupt court.
     
    Regan MacNeil, Jun 14, 2024
    #407
    franticscribe likes this.
  12. MileHigh

    MileHigh Moderator Staff Member

    This is *not* a Second Amendment case, but instead a statutory interpretation case -- whether a bumpstock meets the statutory definition of a machinegun. The ATF in 2018 issued a rule, contrary to its earlier guidance that bumpstocks did not qualify as machineguns, defining bumpstocks as machineguns and ordering owners of bumpstocks to destroy them or turn them over to the ATF within 90 days.

    The Thomas opinion explains that a semiautomatic rifle equipped with a bump stock is not a "machinegun" because it does not fire more than one shot "by a single function of the trigger" as the statute requires.
     
    MileHigh, Jun 14, 2024
    #408
Page 34 of 56
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page