1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Pete Rose is dead

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Regan MacNeil, Sep 30, 2024.

  1. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    With a team arguably less talented than the ones that fell short a few years earlier.
     
    cyclingwriter2 likes this.
  2. justgladtobehere

    justgladtobehere Well-Known Member

    Is there blue font missing?

    I don't think a weak hitting 1B got them there.
     
  3. Della9250

    Della9250 Well-Known Member

    The interesting part to the Hall of Fame discussion:

    This is the year that he would be eligible for a committee ballot, which is normally announced in the next two weeks so something drastic would have to change. The next opportunity to put him on a ballot would be 2027
     
  4. cyclingwriter2

    cyclingwriter2 Well-Known Member

    this part:
    Does the catch he made in Game Six 1980 when the ball popped out of Boone's glove count in that article?

    That play is the crux of Rose’s time in Philadelphia.

    He was a below average hitter in 1980. His fielding was poor. If you look at the overall team stats, the Phillies during the regular season, weren’t that good. It was basically Carlton and Schmidt carrying the team. Marty Bystrom and Tug McGraw were the September spark that pushed them into the playoffs.

    But then came the WS and game six. Who else but Rose makes that play? Who else but Rose ends all of the playoff frustrations. To legions of Phillies fans, that was the magic of Pete Rose.

    Now, if you ask Bob Boone…he has a much different look at the play.
     
  5. cyclingwriter2

    cyclingwriter2 Well-Known Member


    This as good a place as any to share one of the more odd offseason decisions in MLB history that never happened because everyone realized it was bad and fixed it.

    The Phillies needed a second basemen in the 1978 season. It was a black hole offensively in 1978 for them, and apparently management wasn’t high on Jim Morrison to break on through to the majors.

    What the Phillies wanted was Pete Rose because he was a winner and would help them get to the series.

    Pete Rose was second basemen turned corner outfielder turned third basemen at that point and one hell of a hitter.

    What’s the solution?

    Put Rose at first. Move Hebner (who had a very good year offensively in 1979 and had a better ops than rose) to third. Schmidt went to second.

    What happened next is hard to say what is the real story. One version has it Schmidt was hurting his arm making the throw to second. Another is that Hebner was such a downgrade defensively at third, it was ridiculous to move Schmidt. A third was this was all a smoke screen as the Phillies shopped in secret for a second basemen, which of course became Manny Trillo. Who BTW had a higher OPS in 1980 than Rose.
     
  6. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    If they have Hall of Fame careers and aren't in the Hall of Fame because of choices they made, that's their own fault.
     
  7. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    What is the criteria for "choices they made?"

    Racist? No problem. Woman beater? No problem. Tax cheat (Duke Snider)? No problem

    Hell, Cobb and Tris Speaker were implicated in game-fixing schemes.

    That's the problem when you don't just look at what happened on the field. Hundreds of voters, all with different views of morality, are letting moral views cloud their judgment. Don't like staggering drunks? Then you're not letting in Paul Waner, Hack Wilson or Grover Cleveland Alexander.
     
    Driftwood and outofplace like this.
  8. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Do you think there aren't guys who used PEDs in the Hall of Fame? Where is the line?
     
  9. playthrough

    playthrough Moderator Staff Member

    I find little legitimacy in the Hall and hate how these debates still give the place oxygen. And the whole ballot/not ballot/vote/not vote is a waste of time anyway, see Harold Baines not drawing flies from writers and then getting in via a committee that included one of his former managers and owners. Gimme a break.
     
    BartonK and sgreenwell like this.
  10. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    But you aren't grasping the key point there. This isn't about them. This is about the Hall of Fame, and the fact that it isn't what it could be.
     
  11. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Was there a sign in every big league clubhouse that read "No Drinking"?

    And the upstate tourist attraction everyone takes so seriously gets to decide its own rules for inclusion.
     
    2muchcoffeeman likes this.
  12. Junkie

    Junkie Well-Known Member

    Right. And there are, logic would suggest, plenty of others who gambled, but just weren't as dumb about how they went about it as Rose. And now we have the holier-than-thou sanctimonious set which believes nothing, least of all an activity that is now pretty much legal for everyone, is forgivable and baseball is some divine world that nobody can ever smudge. So people like Rose, Shoeless Joe, all the roiders and even Albert Belle can't get in the hall of fame, which would better be described as the Hall of Dudes a Bunch of Dorks who Vote Liked.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page