NFL Week 18 -- Motown Showdown

Then he looks pretty fucking good for being 59 years old!

 

I'm not saying he sucks. I'm not advocating for one way or the other. There's certainly a good case for paying him. There's also a good case for letting him go and handing the reins to McCarthy. Remember, Carson Wentz once looked like an MVP.

 

More importantly, they are competing with youtube and TikTok.

 

What if he's Steve Buscemi?

 

Darnold has been terrific most of the season but the problem is in the game they really needed him, he was awful.
That probably makes longtime Vikings fans nervous because they have a terrible history of choking in the playoffs (mostly in brutal or lopsided fashion). And the Rams are not pushovers, plus they already defeated the Vikings this season.
Maybe the Vikings have gotten the brutal loss out of the way before the playoffs but Vikings fans know all too well about misery in the playoffs and the team hasn't been to the Super Bowl in nearly 50 years.

 

Comparing network TV now to then is endlessly fascinating to me, while also reminding me it used to be so easy to figure out the TV ratings. You just opened up the Life section in USA Today on Wednesday! Now, everything's updated daily (it seems) and there's a million different micro cateogories. All of which is a roundabout way of saying I may be reading this wrong, but per the below link (which is obviously a photo copy of a page in the Life section of a Wednesday USA Today), the no. 1 entertainment show this week in 1990 was "Roseanne," which drew 41.4 million viewers.

Ratings Archive - January 8, 1990 - TV-aholic's TV Blog

The. 1 non-entertainment last week was "Tracker," which has Kevin from "This Is Us" in it. That's about all I know about it. It drew just under 8.2 million viewers, which I believe would have made it the sixth-LEAST watched show this week in 1990. Again, I may be reading this wrong and the difference may not be QUITE that vast, but it's fascinating nonetheless.

https://tvseriesfinale.com/tv-show/2024-25-tv-show-season-ratings-week-13/

 

Gary Cuozzo, 1970.

 

Before 1979 there were the three channels and that was it. HBO and Showtime showed movies, ESPN showed obscure Northeastern basketball teams called Villanova and St. John's, and PBS showed Sesame Street. And WGN and TBS.

 

He knows what you mean.

 

As a lifelong Vikings fan, I feel obligated to weigh in. Here’s the argument for keeping Darnold, IMO:
-he’s only 27
-he still has a very live arm
-he’s not a diva
This isn’t a typical journeyman QB. Sometimes it takes a QB a while to figure it out, like Baker Mayfield, Geno Smith, or the Rich Gannons or Jim Plunketts of the world.
I say tag Darnold and let’s re-evaluate in a year. JJ McCarthy is still very young (21, IIRC) and he’s coming off a nasty knee injury. ….

 

Sure, but when you tag someone, you are committing to $35 to $40m for a QB who may not start for you. The Cleveland Browns are getting roasted for having to pay Watson $46m to maybe not be their starter next year. The Falcons will pay Cousins $27m to definitely not play for them (its funny how much heat the Falcons took for drafting Penix).

And yeah, I'm a Raider fan so I'm resigned to the idea than one of them will end up in the Silver and Black next year - or Rodgers. I'd take McCarthy from the Vikes as well. Any other second-hand or pre-owned QBs out there worth a damn?

 

The tag for Darnold makes sense based on the McCarthy injury. If he's not ready to go, you're throwing away a season building off whatever this ends up as the playoff run to start some rando who signs a one-year deal anyway becuase he's trying to do what Darnold did. The guy just won you 14 games, the short-term solution is works in this case.