1. Coming soon, an updated SportsJournalists.com is coming. If you can't access the site, that might be why, more details coming soon!
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

  3. Coming soon, an updated SportsJournalists.com is coming. If you can't access the site, that might be why, more details coming soon!
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump 2.0: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by MileHigh, Jan 20, 2025.

  1. WriteThinking

    WriteThinking Well-Known Member

    You don't think they were lazy, ignorant, uninformed and uncaring regarding what, how and whom to vote for, assuming they're not horrible people like Trump?

    To me, and most any other who tried to educate themselves at all, and who had any morals at all, there should've been practically no debate about what, how and whom to give a vote.

    That's why there's such turmoil and division right now. And why Trump is so afraid there is so much division: people literally cannot wrap their heads around other voters' decisions, mostly because they cannot ever seem to explain them in specific terms. They literally voted for a celebrity/name person, not someone who they probably would like to actually live under, again assuming that they're not horrible people, of course.
     
    2muchcoffeeman likes this.
  2. WriteThinking

    WriteThinking Well-Known Member

    Because Mark Cuban would be less militant and more ethical about it. There's nothing wrong with that.
     
  3. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

  4. WriteThinking

    WriteThinking Well-Known Member

    We have idiots running our government, and consequently, taking our lives in their hands.

    MSN

    U.S. Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA), a member of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, blasted the FAA firings:

    “Mass firings of FAA workers – at a time when they already have serious staffing problems – would be dangerous at any time. Musk and Trump doing this weeks after the deadliest crash in years is stupid beyond belief.”

    Professor of Public Policy Don Moynihan charged, “even after a bunch of accidents that highlighted FAA staffing shortages they still went ahead and fired FAA staff. They don’t know what they are doing.”
     
  5. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    LOL. Get pwned woke Beyer, AI will solve everything! Robots can get air traffic controllers, noob!
     
  6. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    So EMTS who are on SAR teams in National Parks are an example of "waste and fraud?" What about gun-toting park police? Or firefighters? All of whom have been shitcanned because hurr-de-durr "probationary!"
     
  7. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    The government exists as a public service. It’s not supposed to turn a fucking profit.
     
  8. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Well-Known Member

    If they’re horrible, call them horrible.
     
    Tarheel316 and garrow like this.
  9. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  10. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    It's supposed to break even. Failure of that devalues the money held by the public you're supposed to be servicing. And that Clinton "surplus" sure got a lot of boasting.


    You're responding to an imaginary post.

    [/dickwhitman]

    Well, he's been fined $1.35 million by the NBA for 1. tanking and 2. voicing support of tanking.

    I'll concede Cuban would likely be "less unethical" than Musk. High bar.
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2025
  11. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  12. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

Write your reply...
Uploads are not available.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page