1. Coming soon, an updated SportsJournalists.com is coming. If you can't access the site, that might be why, more details coming soon!
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

  3. Coming soon, an updated SportsJournalists.com is coming. If you can't access the site, that might be why, more details coming soon!
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump 2.0: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by MileHigh, Jan 20, 2025.

  1. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    How it started

    c1dee76f-6cef-4af3-87be-3fe43537067b.jpg

    How it’s going

    3f7aa9eb-6d99-4b09-ab86-f4c598e80a0f.jpg
     
  2. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

  3. BitterYoungMatador2

    BitterYoungMatador2 Well-Known Member

    IMG_4967.jpeg

    Found what I’m calling it.
     
    Jesus_Muscatel and Woody Long like this.
  4. SixToe

    SixToe Well-Known Member

    No. The knee-bending Grand Muskpublican Party would continue to support him, say nothing about the "outrage" voiced by the Dem Party and citizens.

    He has covered pretty much every possibility, no? Felony conviction, amorality, rude and rude behavior, making fun of the disabled (mocking the reporter), praising and being friends with avowed enemies (NoKor, RU), complete disdain for the Rule of Law, outright lying about myriad events, targeting the press and other "enemies" real or perceived, the pardons, transactional behavior out in the open, and likely behind the scenes stuff that would likely be criminal if not disqualifying for any other time in history.

    Who's going to impeach him? What GMP senator would risk alienating his or her voting base to go against him? The military, U.S. Marshals or police? He'd just giggle about the International Court or UN or anything like that. I really hate to sound so defeatist, but who TF is going to do anything to him?

    Even so, you'd get JDV or M Johnson.

    They've done all these "layoffs" and Grassley publicly said they were illegal, and required a 30-day notice and reason why. What happened? Not a f'king thing.

    Quid pro quo with Adams and people are resigning left and right? Ehhh, screw those unloyal RINOs. Bove will just get people we know will support us or fall on the sword like a sucker.

    All the crying about President Musk? Nothing has happened. Nothing. He's still getting access and if they haven't, they will.

    It's going to be a long two years to the midterms.
     
    2muchcoffeeman and UNCGrad like this.
  5. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

  6. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    Yes, his supporters would largely acknowledge it as too far. And if that happens, that'd be a major problem. He'd be out of office.

    The current problem is that many people conflate what is happening with that happening, and they're not remotely the same. And even if I don't agree with some of Trump/DOGE's cuts, I don't believe it's a daily constitutional crisis.

    Trump is absolutely a leader with zero nuance and attention span, prone to real-time experiments and negotiations and online bleats that lack polish. But it's like I'm a policy debate round judge and I'm listening to one of those 1st negative constructive cases where every disadvantage ends in nuclear war.
     
  7. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

    In his first speech to HHS, RJKj ranted about sperm counts of children. A sick freak who we should all be ashamed he has any role in our government.
     
  8. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    What do you call the POTUS giving an unelected individual a de facto line item veto over funds appropriated by Congress if not a "Constitutional crisis?"
     
  9. SixToe

    SixToe Well-Known Member

    Ehhh, just rooting out waste. C'mon, Inky. It's a sound business decision. It's just business!
     
    garrow and Inky_Wretch like this.
  10. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

  11. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  12. playthrough

    playthrough Moderator Staff Member

    [​IMG]
     
Write your reply...
Uploads are not available.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page