1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

should be sympathy for Duke guys, not Rutgers girls

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by keef spoon, Apr 13, 2007.

  1. Trouser_Buddah

    Trouser_Buddah Active Member

    I think I'm going to ill repuke... :-X
     
  2. How, for a second, can you doubt the damage done to these young women? They are a few months past childhood. And for all black women who were insulted, and all women? How can you say how badly they are offended?
    They're barely more than children. How would we feel if they were 18 year-old white girls called basically prostitutes? A whole team? Repreatedly? Your sister or new born?
    Come on guys!
     
  3. Trouser_Buddah

    Trouser_Buddah Active Member

    If I call you a glue-sniffing moron will you be scarred?
     
  4. shotglass

    shotglass Guest

    Omar, settle. At this point, these are NOT girls a few months past childhood. That type of thought went out the window around 1979.

    They've just played a season of major-college basketball, went through several years of hard-core recruiting process and, being Rutgers recruits, have been the center of media and community attention for the past 5-6 years.

    And YOU'RE drawing a racial line there that's not completely true. Rutgers is not an all-black squad.
     
  5. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    They can doubt the damage because they've never been 18 or 19 year old women.

    The I'm scarred for life thing seems like hyperbole to us because we're older and jaded. But I remember thinking I'd be scarred for life at that age over similar stupid comments about me.
     
  6. shotglass

    shotglass Guest

    Thing is -- and this is for everyone, not just major-college athletes -- 18-year-old girls are a lot further from being children today than they were 20 years ago.
     
  7. I'm just saying it's majorly offensive. And we can't say how badly people's feelings are hurt. I was saying there's a history of discrimination all of us can't understand. So, I don't think people are marching because it's good excercise. I don't think these girls are lying about how badly their feelings were hurt.
    And, even if they have played a lot of big-time hoops and had the spotlite on them, they are still just 18 or 19.
    Remember that age?
    Also, remeber, the slur wasn't just about them. But about every girl who looks like them and what our society thinks about them.
     
  8. shotglass

    shotglass Guest

    Omar, listen carefully. We can't remember that age, because we never were that age. We were never 18 years old in the year 2007. That's the difference.
     
  9. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    Shottie, I don't think how you feel during your teen years has changed all that much. Overreacting is and always has been a teenage trait. It's not just confined to teens from 20 years ago.
     
  10. FileNotFound

    FileNotFound Well-Known Member

    Yes, but 20 years ago, teenage overreactions weren't chronicled on a 24-hour news cycle, myspace and message boards. It is different now.
     
  11. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    Society may be different, but the teenage mind really isn't.
     
  12. shotglass

    shotglass Guest

    I disagree. It's much more world-weary.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page