jr/shotglass
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2011
- Messages
- 21,529
Very good.
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
MileHigh said:It's the biggest/most important golf tournament of the year.
Do I feel bad for Tara? Yah. But I also see this as a faux pas by ANGC. This isn't policy of the turn-ament.
Alma said:MileHigh said:It's the biggest/most important golf tournament of the year.
Do I feel bad for Tara? Yah. But I also see this as a faux pas by ANGC. This isn't policy of the turn-ament.
While this is true...it's only true because the media makes it so. The Masters is a media creation. It's not a championship. It's not anything but a "major," that no one officially sanctions. It doesn't have the strongest field. It doesn't have the biggest purse. It doesn't typically produce the best winners. It operates on nostalgia. Who generates that? The press.
SF_Express said:Alma said:MileHigh said:It's the biggest/most important golf tournament of the year.
Do I feel bad for Tara? Yah. But I also see this as a faux pas by ANGC. This isn't policy of the turn-ament.
While this is true...it's only true because the media makes it so. The Masters is a media creation. It's not a championship. It's not anything but a "major," that no one officially sanctions. It doesn't have the strongest field. It doesn't have the biggest purse. It doesn't typically produce the best winners. It operates on nostalgia. Who generates that? The press.
Well, Alma, maybe at the beginning, but we're long past that. Your post implies that if the press could somehow stop covering the Masters tomorrow, it would revert to being the Texas Open.
That probably wasn't true 25 years ago, and it's certainly not true anymore -- if the press said, "Nope, not going to cover it anymore," Masters.org would, and they'd set up their own syndicated TV, and it would still be one of the biggest sports events of the year.
As for the other, it was obviously bad for all the stated reasons, but for those who say, "This should be a first-class event and this shouldn't happen," I say: If you find a way to guarantee that no new and inexperienced human being is ever involved in these kinds of things, ever again, throughout time, let me know. You'll be the first.
Rufino said:There are plenty of things to rip Augusta for, but they aren't guilty here of anything other than employing an overzealous, poorly trained security guard.
Azrael said:Rufino said:There are plenty of things to rip Augusta for, but they aren't guilty here of anything other than employing an overzealous, poorly trained security guard.
ANGC is responsible for the training. Sorry.
21 said:Azrael said:Rufino said:There are plenty of things to rip Augusta for, but they aren't guilty here of anything other than employing an overzealous, poorly trained security guard.
ANGC is responsible for the training. Sorry.
This, and if you're the target of an annual debate about your club's sexist mentality and membership practices, probably a good idea to be sure you don't give folks more proof.