Supreme Court rules in favor of gay marriage

This makes the good point that the ridiculous practice of pretending Scalia is a "brilliant writer" needs to end. He's sad, cranky internet gnome at this point.

Scalia Is a Twitter Egg

 

Happy to see this ruling ... not only is it the right thing to do, but now we'll have page after page of handwritten letters to the editor show up at our shop proclaiming that end of the world is near because "man is laying with man."

My 2 cents: The institution of marriage is being destroyed by heterosexuals — probably the very sons, daughters and grandchildren of our letter to the editor writers. Gays make an easier scapegoat.

 

Tony, even you can't possibly believe that, can you?

If you want to argue that Roberts is right, that's fine. You're wrong, but I get it. But the side of history? You are kidding yourself.

 

Mazel Tov!

 

By the way, congrats to all the SJ.com posters this may affect. Waiting for a flood of fabulous wedding invites!

 

Old Tony and is black, male democrat lover will be the first.

 

So what's the writer equivalent? The crankiness of Murray Chass? Riding on reputation like latter-day Reilly, except we don't have the SI Vault to remind us of once was ("Yeah, Scalia's terrible now, but remember the dissent in the Marge Schott case or when he wrote the majority opinion in Gumbel v. Letterman?"

 

CNN Forced To Go To Commercial After "About Fucking Time!" Invasion

 

All polygamy is banned equally.