Supreme Court rules in favor of gay marriage

Don't be stupid.

 

#asusualuhavenothing

 

Here's someone who doesn't seem to understand that by definition, a Supreme Court ruling cannot be unconstitutional:

Clerk Defies Unconstitutional Court: Won’t Issue “Marriage” Licenses to Homosexuals

 

She's liable to lose a lot of those humanitarian awards.

 

Is that Tommy Lasorda? I hate Tommy Lasorda.

 

Dred Scott disagrees.

 

What is the purpose of the Supreme Court if not to decide what's constitutional?

 

The problem is the Supreme Court is made up of people ... people with biases. So we end up with some things that clearly aren't constitutional now that at one time were ruled to be constitutional.

But one thing seems certain: The Bill of Rights is now only the first nine amendments, not the first 10. The 10th Amendment no longer exists.

 

Robot Supreme Court?

 

1) I thought the Second Amendment was the only one that mattered.
2). Who decides what laws are constitutional if not the courts?

 

Robot Supreme Court. No bias.

 

Well, the Second Amendment makes all the rest of the Constitution enforceable.

You speak of the Supreme Court as infallible, yet we have the Dred Scott decision, Plessy v. Ferguson, Korematsu v. United States, Pace v. Alabama, Kelo v. New London, Roe v. Wade ... I could go on and on,