1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Letting SIDs cover their own schools

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Disillusioned Journalist, Nov 3, 2017.

  1. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    I consider using the PR flaks for the local pros the same as SIDs doing it for schools, so:

    Central Pennsylvania has three pro franchises: The Harrisburg Senators (AA baseball), the Hershey Bears (AHL) and the Harrisburg City Islanders (USL PRO).

    The local paper does this for all three franchises. It might throw a staffer out there if it's a playoff game, although I'm not sure they'd even do that anymore.

    I am not a fan of the practice.

    This is true. But it's less true with every passing year, and I'm not just talking about news organizations. More of the "I won't touch a computer" people die off, and we're getting closer and closer to the point where that group will be such a minority that they simply will not be catered to. It's going to be, "You don't use the Internet? Well, then you don't get the information."
     
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2017
    TexasVet and Doc Holliday like this.
  2. Doc Holliday

    Doc Holliday Well-Known Member

    Sorry, Dan. Nothing personal against you or your job. Hell, I'd much rather be an SID these days.
     
    TexasVet and BurnsWhenIPee like this.
  3. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    I appreciate SIDs and what they do as much as the next guy. But they can't be surprised that we would cast a wary eye on newspapers using them to do what used to be in-house work.

    You know ... like design hubs.
     
    Doc Holliday likes this.
  4. daytonadan1983

    daytonadan1983 Well-Known Member

    Oh, I don't blame you for being wary. Just respect and appreciate what we're trying to do for us , and yes, for your side of the fence.
     
  5. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    It's not as though you're going to say no, Dan, and I wouldn't expect you to. Your job is to get your school's "word" out there.

    But through no fault of your own, it's allowing newspapers to continue to cut staffs. Sports information departments are not the cause, but in a small way, it's having an affect.
     
  6. daytonadan1983

    daytonadan1983 Well-Known Member

    "Flaks"? Really?
     
  7. Jake_Taylor

    Jake_Taylor Well-Known Member

    Uh, you look up flack in the dictionary and the definition is public relations agent.
     
  8. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    I'm really not sure. I often confuse flack, flak and Roberta Flack.
     
    HanSenSE and BurnsWhenIPee like this.
  9. pageviews

    pageviews New Member

    And Joe Flacco.
     
    Doc Holliday likes this.
  10. Jake_Taylor

    Jake_Taylor Well-Known Member

    Oh, are we talking about the spelling? I thought he took offense to the term.
     
  11. daytonadan1983

    daytonadan1983 Well-Known Member

    M
    And there are legitimate definitions to faggot and fudge packer as well....
     
    Doc Holliday likes this.
  12. Jake_Taylor

    Jake_Taylor Well-Known Member

    Not the same thing at all. Webster notes that faggot is offensive. Flack is like calling a writer a scribe.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page