1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. melock

    melock Well-Known Member


     
    garrow likes this.
  2. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    Looks like they spelled everything correctly, though. Baby steps ...
     
  3. Slacker

    Slacker Well-Known Member

    To the Editor:

    While Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg deserve the grilling they are getting on the Hill, I find it amazing that Robert and Rebekah Mercer and their control of Cambridge Analytica are not getting the same treatment.

    There are laws about how much money individuals can donate to candidates. If the Mercers are behind this incredible abuse of information gathering, done solely to sway an election, then why are they not being called on the carpet just as dramatically?

    Opinion | The Facebook Data Scandal and the Mercers

    [​IMG]
     
  4. exmediahack

    exmediahack Well-Known Member

    A little late to this...

    Paul Ryan never wanted to play a part in the Trump Melodrama. He is a serious political leader. Trump mocked Ryan in the campaign and the early days of being in office. Ryan stood there, generally took it and likely plotted his exit.

    (Also, as one who covered Wisconsin politics, Ryan is an actual good person. Same for the two Senators - Baldwin and Johnson, as was Herb Kohl -- who was the cranky grandpa. Walker and Feingold are documented tools, both possibly without souls.)

    This actually plays out very well for Ryan.

    Assume that Scott Walker loses in 2018 (if the Democrats, this time, can find someone more in-touch than the heir to a company that makes $3,000 bicycles).
    Political winds always change. Saw it between 2008 and 2010. Between 2010 and 2012. Back to 2014.

    By 2020, Trump will lose, Democrats will have the Senate, possibly the House. They'll overreach with their newfound power (as Republicans always do as well), and in 2022, Ryan can run for governor of Wisconsin -- and likely win.
     
    QYFW likes this.
  5. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    This is a plausible scenario, but predicting what politics will look like in November 2022 is a high-risk endeavor. Too many events will take place to make it just cyclical. Cycles are powerful, but not all-powerful.
     
  6. exmediahack

    exmediahack Well-Known Member

    True but I would argue that our pendulum back and forth swings so frequently now that the predicted doom by some of the Republican Party in 2008 or the Democratic Party in 2014 isn't doom -- just wait til the next cycle.
     
  7. DanielSimpsonDay

    DanielSimpsonDay Well-Known Member


    This tweet was good in the beginning, then it went too far
     
  8. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    I will never vote for anyone, for any office, who didn’t explicitly denounce Trump in 2015-16.
     
    Big Circus and BadgerBeer like this.
  9. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Trump and Trumpism aren't part of any cycle.
     
  10. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    Huh huh.

    Tremendous pressure.

    Really hard.

    [​IMG]
     
  11. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    We already know he doesn't use protection.
     
  12. melock

    melock Well-Known Member

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page