MLB 2018 regular season thread

How do you prove somebody is using X so as to mask the use of Y (presumably verboten)? Don't you have to know that somebody is using Y? And if so, why do you give a shit if they're using X?

 

Through seven.

Best Twitter follow for this one: @berniewilson of AP.

 

Moody Blues

 

They do, for one.

 

Crispin Glover definitely plays the singer ca. early years in the biopic.

 

It's simple, really ...

 

And, it's gone. Padres maintain their place in history.

 

I think that uncertainty is why you need a doctor's note to use the masking agent for a legitimate condition.

 

No, it really isn't. For one thing, we've had this conversation many times, yet LTL wanted to go there again. He is talking about people saying Braun was clean. I'm asking him to show us one of those people. I know it wasn't me because I never posted that.

Dick is still ducking the point about his hit-and-miss use of small sample sizes. I'm not saying Dickie defended the use of a small sample size by the scouts. I'm saying he ignored it while ranting about people who used a slightly larger sample size from the regular season. Do you need a more detailed explanation or are you just going to keep on being you?

 

Before the PED bust, you would be right, but what about now? It's not like there are flaws on the resume beyond the PED use keeping Bonds and Clemens out, and when you look only at production, they both have cases much better than Cano's.