1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

  2. Hermes

    Hermes Well-Known Member

    melock, Slacker, HanSenSE and 7 others like this.
  3. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    Only simple people look for simple answers to life’s complexities.
     
  4. Justin_Rice

    Justin_Rice Well-Known Member

    If "all credibility is gone," how can more be lost? Can you go into the negatives, when we're counting credibility?
     
  5. Justin_Rice

    Justin_Rice Well-Known Member

    Agreed.

    The slogan wasn't, "No Taxation!"

    It was, "No taxation with Representation!"

    We can rephrase that to, "Taxation, but only if I get to vote in some Representatives!"
     
  6. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Scientific American.

    Abortion Is a Problem to Be Solved, Not a Moral Issue

    To be fair, the multivariable mesh of correlations in all these studies makes inferring direct causal links difficult for social scientists to untangle. But as I read the research, when women have limited sex education and no access to contraception, they are more likely to get pregnant, which leads to higher abortion rates. When women are educated about and have access to effective contraception, as well as legal and medically safe abortions, they initially use both strategies to control family size, after which contraception alone is often all that is needed and abortion rates decline.
     
    Last edited: Aug 15, 2018
  7. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

  8. Stoney

    Stoney Well-Known Member

    Just to expand on that, not only were tariffs how we got our tax dough before the income tax, but even after the income tax came in, we continued to maintain protectionist economic policies until the 1990s. It wasn't until the NAFTA/free trade/globalization era emerged in the mid-90s that the word tariffs got re-defined as a naughty word.

    That's not meant as a defense of Trump, nor does it mean I support what he's doing. I'm just pointing out that some characterizations of his trade war policies as hysterical insanity strike me as perhaps a bit overboard. In reality, he's basically just suggesting doing things the way we did before the mid-90s. And, you know, the US did pretty damn well during those years.
     
    Last edited: Aug 15, 2018
  9. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

     
    lakefront likes this.
  10. Hermes

    Hermes Well-Known Member

    Looking at global supply chains, I just don't see a way back there. I just see a lot of pain if we even try to get back there.
     
    Stoney likes this.
  11. TigerVols

    TigerVols Well-Known Member

  12. Justin_Rice

    Justin_Rice Well-Known Member

    ... speaking of words which have suddenly been cast as naughty ....
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page