1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Will COVID-19 be the needle that finally bursts the sports bubble?

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by BitterYoungMatador2, Apr 2, 2020.

  1. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    We may not *get* a vaccine. While one was developed for MERS, there is still no vaccine for SARS.

    Would you like to share a locker room with 85 guys? How would you feel about it if one of them was diagnosed the week after you did? Would you be concerned for your life, or your family's? Would you be willing to do it repeatedly so that the public could watch a ball game? Seems a stupid thing to risk your health over to me.

    Yes, I get that they would be doing it for money. Again, each person will have to do the personal risk/benefit analysis. I doubt it happens anytime soon, and like so much about this, we have no idea how the pandemic will run or what the aftermath will look like. We're all pretty much pulling shit out of our hats when we try to talk more than three or four weeks out .
     
  2. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    Your first sentence, coupled with your subsequent scenario, is why I suggested sports is in trouble.

    Sans vaccine, infection perpetually looms, we project our own choices onto those of athletes, and political leaders, marching to the drum of public health leaders trained only to mitigate risk - which is what they should be doing! - can't bear the idea of letting people be responsible for what happens. So we get stasis. We get nothing at all for our inability to live in the tension.

    It's kind of like, on the smallest, most insignificant scale, we got rid of the college sports video games a few years ago because a group of know-it-all authoritarian thinkers, led by Jay Bilas, deemed them immoral because college athletics hadn't figured out how to cut in student-athletes on the profits. Players loved the games. So did gamers. But we couldn't have them because a small segment of media society clucked its tongue sufficiently enough to shame college presidents into getting rid of them.

    It's also like the weird, insistent argument this week that you couldn't possibly bring back football players to campus for practice when in-person classes weren't in session. Speaking in sheer logic, you're not going to convince me or most sane thinkers that LSU's 120 football players are safer scattered all over the country - with plenty in COVID-19 overrun New Orleans - than they would be two months from now after a 14-day quarantine, in sanitized dorms and controlled practice environments on an empty campus. If you isolated them, after quarantine, you can control that environment, prepare, take daily temperatures, and be ready to play the games. But such an approach is sacrilegious to the "don't move! don't group! don't even think about anything but coast-to-coast death, lest your thoughts infect a weaker person!" monastic doom aesthetic currently rolling over social media.

    We'll see how long it lasts. The NFL, thankfully, is so entrenched (some say tone deaf) that Adam Schefter's "carnage in the streets!" rant was shrugged off. They had free agency - which went fine! - and they'll have the Draft, which will go just fine, and the world will march on. Schefter will even have actual work to do.
     
    Batman likes this.
  3. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    Yup. The world will continue to spin, and we will come to accept whatever the new reality brings us. I hope (lord I hope) that things get back to normal, but I don't count on that happening quickly. Otherwise I'm very much in the "wait and see" camp. I'm not really willing to speculate much when things are changing so rapidly around us. The reality we'll be adapting to has not developed yet.
     
  4. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    T.I.G.E.R.S (This Is Gonna End Real Soon) is straight out of The Onion. Or so you’d think.
     
    BitterYoungMatador2 likes this.
  5. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    This is really well written. I don’t agree with it, but is a great read.
     
  6. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    I honestly don't remember exactly what happened with the video game case, but wasn't it Ed O'Bannon who sued the NCAA and EA on behalf of the players? The media reported on that story, but I don't remember the media being the driving force behind that. It was O'Bannon.
     
  7. sgreenwell

    sgreenwell Well-Known Member

    The NCAA also views the idea of compensating players as the Rubicon that it isn't going to cross, under any circumstance. Like, those video game deals were potentially huge money for them, and they chose to just cancel them rather than figure out a way to compensate players. ("It would be difficult to compensate players properly, or to pay them, so let's not even try.")

    With professional sports leagues, and especially the NFL... I don't know. The mortality rates are still high enough that I can't imagine professional players being comfortable with the risk. Some players will push to play, because they need or want the money, or because they don't think it'll effect them, whereas others, maybe they figure they have enough cash and don't need the risk - like we've seen with some guys and concussions.
     
  8. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    Oh lord. There's no sports news. I'm seeing conference re-organization threads popping up.

    OTOH, if conferences wanted to cut expenses by trying to make more geographical sense (see C-USA, SBC) this would seem to be a good time to do it.
     
  9. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    Well, this is simple.

    New Conference USA (westernish schools)
    North Texas
    Louisiana Tech
    UTEP
    UTSA
    Rice
    Southern Miss
    Little Rock
    Texas State
    UT Arlington
    Louisiana
    Arkansas State
    UL Monroe
    South Alabama

    New Sun Belt (easternish schools)
    Western Kentucky
    Charlotte
    Marshall
    FIU
    ODU
    FAU
    Middle Tennessee
    Georgia Southern
    Georgia State
    Appalachian State
    Coastal Carolina
    Troy
    UAB

    13 schools in each league. Had to split the Alabama schools somehow and Mobile is by far the most western of those schools. Let it be done.
     
    OscarMadison likes this.
  10. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    Yeah, or N/S/E/W. Or something. C-USA is completely insane geographically and the Belt isn't much better.

    OTOH, you're going to see some of the larger and more academically credited schools looking at some of those schools with major side-eye. Then is it two rearranged leagues or one G5 super league? And what about the various contract obligations?
     
    OscarMadison likes this.
  11. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    Please let this happen.
    Send Clemson and University-6 to the SEC, where they belong. The ACC will survive if that allows FSU to reclaim supremacy.
     
  12. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    I can see this happening in the G5, not so sure about the P5. The time is right if they're going to try it though. Plenty of time to negotiate and implement it.

    Mostly it's going to be message board cancer.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page