1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Biden: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Jan 20, 2021.

  1. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    I’m confused. Active duty military are prohibited from partisan activity. How did she avoid that pesky provision?
     
    Driftwood likes this.
  2. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  3. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

  4. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    But wait there's more! But Harris doesn't do interviews.
     
    garrow likes this.
  5. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    Walz didn’t answer the question on how the MN law compares to Roe, did he?
    The Fox host appears to be right when she says MN law imposes no restrictions and does not address the trimester system mandated by Roe.
     
  6. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  7. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    Yeah, I noticed that too. What Walz needed to do there was to say that women aren’t having third trimester abortions on a whim and that the Minn. law is designed to help them if they face an emergency situation.
     
    tapintoamerica likes this.
  8. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  9. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    Funny. I can remember a time when there was a lot of concern that Twitter might have a bit of a political slant.

     
  10. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

    Lies. And treason. And then more lies and treason.

     
  11. Driftwood

    Driftwood Well-Known Member

    In 1992, I had a US Navy commander (O5) actually say to me - 21-year-old Petty Officer Nobody - that all active duty military personnel should be required to vote for the sitting POTUS.
    Me, scratching head: "Uhhhhhhhhhhh?"
     
  12. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    Wow.
    At least that was in private, which explains why the superior officer got away with it. How does this Trumpist do it in full public view?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page