1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

NFL Week 16 -- Football overload

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Cosmo, Dec 17, 2024.

  1. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    To give them time to get the TD they need. Likely a Hail Mary
     
  2. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    Broncos will get a Chiefs team at home in Week 18 that will be playing for nothing. Understand your concern, but the Broncos banked enough wins early that they should get in, even with a loss to Cincy.
     
    Roscablo likes this.
  3. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    The full lyric little bandbox experience!
     
  4. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    They also couldn't win without a field goal.
    They were only at the 35 or 40 yard line, so it most likely would have taken another 4-5 plays to get the touchdown, which burns 25 or 30 seconds in a best case scenario.
    Kick the FG there, and they keep more time on the clock to get the second score they needed. Plus, as almost happened, they might be able to get the ball back by using their two timeouts.
    It's just modern NFL game theory.
     
    Roscablo likes this.
  5. Roscablo

    Roscablo Well-Known Member

    I don't understand why more teams don't do it when down by 10 or 11. They waste all their time scoring the TD that if they do get the ball back then they have to score a TD again on a hail mary.

    If the Broncos had recorded the onside kick they would have had 50 seconds and two timeouts to score the TD. It's smart.
     
    HanSenSE, Batman and MileHigh like this.
  6. poindexter

    poindexter Well-Known Member

    I'm not fighting a Texas Death match over this. I've never worn a headset on a sideline.

    But you had 57 seconds and 2 time outs. Why not at least try for a TD? The alternative Payton took was a 55 yarder on first down!
     
  7. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    I thought that they maybe should have run one more play to try and get closer, instead of going for a 55-yard field goal that isn't a sure thing. That was the only quibble I had with it.
    In that scenario, I think they were also trying to save the two timeouts as an insurance policy in case they didn't get the onside kick. If they'd have had another 5-10 seconds they'd have gotten the ball back with time for at least one lateral play.
     
  8. Roscablo

    Roscablo Well-Known Member

    55 is pretty long, guess he has faith in the kicker!

    It's actually the second time Payton has done this this year, both against the Chargers. Didn't get the onside kick either time.
     
  9. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    The success rate for onside kicks this year was 7 percent and now is down whatever fraction after last night.
     
  10. ChrisLong

    ChrisLong Well-Known Member

    Payton had the decision to make -- do one thing or the other. If he goes for the touchdown, people would have come here and said he should have kicked a FG. If he kicks the FG, people will come here and said he should have gone for the TD. This is Talk Radio fodder ... and the reason there are horse races.
     
  11. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    I thought that distance was pretty big at that time.
     
  12. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    Fox’s Sunday broadcast plans have entered the transfer portal.

    IMG_6709.jpeg
     
    2muchcoffeeman likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page