Batman said:
Michael_ Gee said:
Rick: Harsh but true. Even Girardi was surprised when it happened. BTW, MLB playing ability and managing ability have of course never been related. You could make a case the Hall of Fame manager with the best playing career was John McGraw. And if it isn't him, it might be Casey Stengel.
He's not there yet, but will be, so what about Joe Torre? He won an MVP award and had a decent career.
Torre should be in the Hall of Fame as a player, and certainly will get in as a manager. Here are the current Hall of Fame managers (courtesy of Baseball Almanac), with Torre, Bobby Cox and Tony LaRussa certain to join the list as soon as they've been retired long enough.
Walter Alston --- Had one major-league at-bat and struck out (1936 Cardinals)
Sparky Anderson --- Played one season in the majors (1959 Phillies), but got 477 at-bats. Only hit .218 with no power, but still, you'd think he'd have gotten another shot. Anybody know the reason he didn't?
Leo Durocher --- Classic good-field, no-hit shortstop, though he wasn't as bad a hitter (career average of .247) as people remember (he was nicknamed "The All-American Out)." Hung around for 1,637 games over 17 seasons, but is more famous for supposedly stealing Babe Ruth's watch than anything else he did as a player.
Rube Foster --- Negro-Leaguer. Damn good pitcher in his day by all accounts, though the early black baseball records are sketchy. Supposedly taught Christy Mathewson his famous "fadeaway" pitch, though many historians dispute that.
Ned Hanlon --- Played 13 seasons in the 1880s and 90s, but was only a .260 career hitter in an era when guys routinely hit 100 points higher.
Bucky Harris --- Fairly good hitter, though not much power. Regularly hit leadoff (.352 career OBP) for some very good Washington Senators teams in the 1920s.
Miller Huggins --- Very similar player to Harris --- slap-hitting middle infielder who walked a lot, but played about a decade before.
Tommy Lasorda --- Pitched 58 innings over three seasons with the Dodgers in the mid 1950s. 0-4 with a 6.58 ERA.
Al Lopez --- Caught nearly 2,000 games for several teams in the 1930s and 40s. Wasn't much of a hitter (most catchers in those days weren't), but made four All-Star teams.
Connie Mack --- Played 11 years for three teams in the 1880s and 90s, but was, again, your classic no-hit catcher. The difference with Mack was that he couldn't field, either. He somehow managed to commit 76 passed balls in 1887.
Joe McCarthy --- Never played in the majors, which was extremely rare for a manager of his caliber at that time. Supposedly, that's among the many reasons he and Babe Ruth clashed so much.
John McGraw --- An excellent hitter and baserunner from 1891 to 1906 (though he was more or less done as a player by 1902). Hit as high as .391 and stole as many as 78 bases.
Bill McKechnie --- A .250-hitting third baseman with no power or speed, but managed to get into 846 major-league games.
Wilbert Robinson --- Like Lopez, hung around forever and was considered one of the better catchers of his day. Not a bad hitter, either, at least for a catcher (.273 career average).
Frank Selee --- Never played in the majors.
Casey Stengel --- He was such a legend (and a clown) as a manager that people forget how good a player he was. A .284 career hitter, drew walks, actually had some power (89 career triples) and was at least a league-average outfielder defensively. Played 1,277 games over 14 seasons in the 1910s and 20s.
Earl Weaver --- Never played in the majors.
So that's the list. I'd agree with Michael that the best "player" among the Hall of Fame managers was McGraw, then Stengel, followed by Lopez, Robinson, Harris and Huggins.
McGraw might have made the Hall of Fame as a player even if he'd never managed. I don't think you can say that about anyone else on this list, except maybe Lopez. Torre would be in that discussion as well.