dreunc1542 said:Adele is really good. Amy Winehouse, when she wasn't messed up, was better.
Two artists with almost nothing in common, why the need to compare?
Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
dreunc1542 said:Adele is really good. Amy Winehouse, when she wasn't messed up, was better.
21 said:dreunc1542 said:Adele is really good. Amy Winehouse, when she wasn't messed up, was better.
Two artists with almost nothing in common, why the need to compare?
I don't believe that they are.deck Whitman said:21 said:dreunc1542 said:Adele is really good. Amy Winehouse, when she wasn't messed up, was better.
Two artists with almost nothing in common, why the need to compare?
Nothing in common? Really? They are practically carbon copies, musically.
deck Whitman said:21 said:dreunc1542 said:Adele is really good. Amy Winehouse, when she wasn't messed up, was better.
Two artists with almost nothing in common, why the need to compare?
Nothing in common? Really? They are practically carbon copies, musically.