J
JackyJackBN
Guest
Fenian_Bastard said:JackyJackBN said:Fenian_Bastard said:JackyJackBN said:Didn't read about it in the newspaper, did you?three_bags_full said:JackyJackBN said:three_bags_full said:And about 20 days later I was 30,000 feet above Afghanistan, for about 18 months. Fun times.
There you are, Three!
Any words of wisdom on the defacing of the Wall? I'm in a bit of a snit. If any oil touched Cliff McKittrick's name...let's just say, I don't want to know.
Sorry, JJBN. You lost me there, man.
Sorry I don't have time right now to find the AP version. If there is one.
http://www.soldiersperspective.us/2007/09/10/vietnam-memorial-wall-defaced-september-7-9/
Cliff was a West Point grad and dear friend, mia. Pick the name of your choice; he's mine.
Sorry.
A post from the Freepers blaming "the antiwar crowd"?
Not a single google entry I can find from a legitimate news source, or a direct quote from the Park Service?
Forgive me if my standard of proof is a tad higher.
OK. What's not disputed is that there is a a clear oily substance--comparable to WD-40, for example, and that's my example from reading and viewing the video--on areas (names) on the base of the Wall. Accident or deliberate defacement, it bothers me. It's not easily removed, whatever it is.
Is it news or not? Well, to me it is, but you're right, it was only reported by people who care. And they aren't professional journalists. Call 'em freepers, call 'em veterans, call 'em any name you please. They jumped to a conclusion, and so did I. Still don't like it.
I don't like it, either. As it happens, I covered the controversy over the building of the Wall back in the late '70's when I was a baby reporter for an alternative weekly. There was a lot of noise from the stab-in-the-back crowd -- the Freepers of their day -- about how dirty hippes were attempting to memorialize our vets with an "ugly hole in the ground." There even was some noxious stuff about the fact that the designer -- Maya Lin -- was Asian. I don't know anyone today who thinks of the Wall with anything less than almost mystic reverence, including me. I, too, am upset that it was marked up, but to charge this up to "defacement" by "the antiwar crowd" is noxious paranoia from the worst of the right.
All's I'm sayin'.
I ran through about three sites, posted the one I felt was least noxious. I was in a hurry, and having a shirt of a day. No excuse, just factual.
Defacement, that's not established. Could have been oil from a leaf-blower, I suppose. (And if it's not easily removed, that should be news too, although of a lesser degree.) Let's just make sure that others understand you're not quoting me when you use the phrase "the antiwar crowd". You won't get that from me.
Also, there should be an inkling here about how I feel about Asians. An inkling.
And that's more than enough from me on this subject.