Batman Vs Superman has interesting concepts and thematic material (Superman as a metaphor fornUS intervention on foreign soil) that were almost executed in a great way. Then it had concepts that were good on paper and executed like dog shirt: Martha. That could have been a powerful moment for Batman, to realize he was turning into the kind of person he setnout to fight. But it just did not work the way it was played.
Meanwhile, Civil War gave us just as interesting themes to chew on and hit it out of the park.
However, I'm done with the notion of reactions to collateral damage being a major plot point. We got that in both BvS and CW. The outrage at Man of Steel's depiction of destruction during super figuts even had Marvel trying to address it, even though no one complained after Avengers.
But until now, collateral damage was never given more than a few seconds' thought in these types of movies. Now that both sides have had their say, time to move on, we'll assume everybody feels bad when CGI buildings fall down, and just tell the stories they want to tell.
And if the imagery of CGI buildings being destroyed and fictional people dying in mass numbers bothers you, I recommend skipping Independence Day 2.