• Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

BCS leagues expanding - yeah?

The housing bubble - a good analogy. I understand the need for schools to increase revenues due to decreasing govt. support, but this thing seemed to get legs before it was even thought through. Conferences became more worried about being lost in the shuffle, than really figuring out what they wanted.
 
Here, read this link. The Pac-10 has not just thought of expanding in the past two weeks. I think the league has thought about this for a while and went and got a man who could pull it off.


http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegesports/2010/06/08/pac-10-expansion-should-we-have-seen-the-possible-big-12-invites-coming/
 
I think the Big 10 network thinks it only needs a couple more teams to get enough markets to make money.
I think they are wrong. If you can't make it work with almost all of the Midwest, St. Louis and Omaha aren't going to be enough either. And really, I don't even think Notre Dame would make that much of a difference.
 
albert77 said:
If the SEC expands, I think Clemson, Florida State and Georgia Tech will be the first three they call. After that, it could get interesting for that fourth spot. North Carolina would probably be the first choice, followed by Virginia Tech and Miami.

Kentucky fans, especially those on Cats Pause, tend to think it would be Clemson, Florida State, Georgia Tech and Miami.

They keep on talking about TV markets - although the SEC is already firmly in all three of those states - but by taking those specific four, the SEC would be kicking the ACC out of the south.

TV market wise - isn't what this is supposed to be about - the SEC nabbing Clemson, Florida State, Georgia Tech and Miami doesn't make sense. Product-wise, however, it makes a lot of sense.

I do find it funny, though, that SEC-Kentucky fans love to bash Big East-Louisville fans over their huge conference with unbalanced scheduling.

Then they would turn around and do the same damn thing.
 
Central-KY-Kid said:
albert77 said:
If the SEC expands, I think Clemson, Florida State and Georgia Tech will be the first three they call. After that, it could get interesting for that fourth spot. North Carolina would probably be the first choice, followed by Virginia Tech and Miami.

Kentucky fans, especially those on Cats Pause, tend to think it would be Clemson, Florida State, Georgia Tech and Miami.

That would have been my initial thought, too, but if UNC were to express a serious interest in joining the SEC, then they move ahead of Miami. The Heels would obviously offer big-time hoops cachet and they draw better in football than the Canes.

One thing I'm not up on, and this is something maybe Sam Mills and a few others from that area might enlighten us on, is whether the NC legislature would put the squeeze on to keep UNC tethered to Duke, NC State and Wake.
 
Nebraska to Big Ten almost official?

http://www.omaha.com/article/20100608/NEWS01/100609687#nu-to-big-10-as-early-as-friday
 
albert77 said:
Central-KY-Kid said:
albert77 said:
If the SEC expands, I think Clemson, Florida State and Georgia Tech will be the first three they call. After that, it could get interesting for that fourth spot. North Carolina would probably be the first choice, followed by Virginia Tech and Miami.

Kentucky fans, especially those on Cats Pause, tend to think it would be Clemson, Florida State, Georgia Tech and Miami.

That would have been my initial thought, too, but if UNC were to express a serious interest in joining the SEC, then they move ahead of Miami. The Heels would obviously offer big-time hoops cachet and they draw better in football than the Canes.

One thing I'm not up on, and this is something maybe Sam Mills and a few others from that area might enlighten us on, is whether the NC legislature would put the squeeze on to keep UNC tethered to Duke, NC State and Wake.

I'm not sure where this UNC in the SEC speculation keeps coming from, but there's no way I can see the alumni standing for it. I'd expect Holden Thorp and deck Baddour to get run out of town on a rail if they started talking seriously about it.

EDIT: Oh, and Duke and Wake have little to no sway with the legislature. This ain't Texas.
 
Colorado spokesperson says, with a straight face, that there's nothing on the table.

http://www.buffzone.com/ci_15254981
 
What will all this realignment do for the bowl situation? If the Craptaculardotcom bowl features the 6th best team from the B-12 and the 5th best team from the B-10, those conferences will be totally different (maybe gone in the B12).

The Rose Bowl can no longer hold up the "traditional" Big 10 vs Pac-10 Rivalry. Half the teams in the conferences would be brand new. Maybe this is a way to finally bring us a playoff.
 
Like I've said, I eagerly await the Kansas-Indiana State Mountain West-Missouri Valley Conference Showdown game.

(I'm just messing with you Oz. :D )
 
Inky_Wretch said:
How disappointed will people be if nothing changes after all this?

There will be changes. Whether it's total chaos or not remains to be seen.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top